kopia lustrzana https://gitlab.com/sane-project/website
186 wiersze
7.0 KiB
HTML
186 wiersze
7.0 KiB
HTML
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"
|
|
"http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/loose.dtd">
|
|
<HTML>
|
|
<HEAD>
|
|
<TITLE>sane-devel: Re: [snapscan] Problem with 2.4.0-test10 and AGFA S</TITLE>
|
|
<META NAME="Author" CONTENT="Lawrence Glaister (lg@jfm.bc.ca)">
|
|
<META NAME="Subject" CONTENT="Re: [snapscan] Problem with 2.4.0-test10 and AGFA SnapScan 1236S">
|
|
</HEAD>
|
|
<BODY BGCOLOR="#FFFFFF" TEXT="#000000">
|
|
<H1>Re: [snapscan] Problem with 2.4.0-test10 and AGFA SnapScan 1236S</H1>
|
|
<!-- received="Mon Nov 6 16:13:43 2000" -->
|
|
<!-- isoreceived="20001107001343" -->
|
|
<!-- sent="Mon, 6 Nov 2000 16:19:27 -0800" -->
|
|
<!-- isosent="20001107001927" -->
|
|
<!-- name="Lawrence Glaister" -->
|
|
<!-- email="lg@jfm.bc.ca" -->
|
|
<!-- subject="Re: [snapscan] Problem with 2.4.0-test10 and AGFA SnapScan 1236S" -->
|
|
<!-- id="00a501c04850$63d411c0$bf0aa8c0@dufusiii" -->
|
|
<!-- inreplyto="20001107081330.A632@freeman.little-possums.net" -->
|
|
<STRONG>From:</STRONG> Lawrence Glaister (<A HREF="mailto:lg@jfm.bc.ca?Subject=Re:%20[snapscan]%20Problem%20with%202.4.0-test10%20and%20AGFA%20SnapScan%201236S&In-Reply-To=<00a501c04850$63d411c0$bf0aa8c0@dufusiii>"><EM>lg@jfm.bc.ca</EM></A>)<BR>
|
|
<STRONG>Date:</STRONG> Mon Nov 06 2000 - 16:19:27 PST
|
|
<P>
|
|
<!-- next="start" -->
|
|
<LI><STRONG>Next message:</STRONG> <A HREF="0113.html">Russ Burdick: "Re: [snapscan] Problem with 2.4.0-test10 and AGFA SnapScan 1236S"</A>
|
|
<UL>
|
|
<LI><STRONG>Previous message:</STRONG> <A HREF="0111.html">Henning Meier-Geinitz: "Re: detection problem"</A>
|
|
<LI><STRONG>In reply to:</STRONG> <A HREF="0107.html">Timothy Little: "Re: [snapscan] Problem with 2.4.0-test10 and AGFA SnapScan 1236S"</A>
|
|
<!-- nextthread="start" -->
|
|
<LI><STRONG>Next in thread:</STRONG> <A HREF="0113.html">Russ Burdick: "Re: [snapscan] Problem with 2.4.0-test10 and AGFA SnapScan 1236S"</A>
|
|
<!-- reply="end" -->
|
|
<LI><STRONG>Messages sorted by:</STRONG>
|
|
<A HREF="date.html#112">[ date ]</A>
|
|
<A HREF="index.html#112">[ thread ]</A>
|
|
<A HREF="subject.html#112">[ subject ]</A>
|
|
<A HREF="author.html#112">[ author ]</A>
|
|
</UL>
|
|
<HR NOSHADE><P>
|
|
<!-- body="start" -->
|
|
<P>
|
|
I dont have a 2.2 system at the moment. But I have noticed occasional
|
|
<BR>
|
|
problems
|
|
<BR>
|
|
when scanning subsections of the entire scanner area. It is quite possible
|
|
<BR>
|
|
that we
|
|
<BR>
|
|
may need to limit sizes to multiples of 8 or 16 pixels... This is a total
|
|
<BR>
|
|
guess, but
|
|
<BR>
|
|
could explain some of the odd scans I have seen. I haven't looked at the
|
|
<BR>
|
|
interaction
|
|
<BR>
|
|
between xscanimage or xsane and the backend.... I'm not sure if the
|
|
<BR>
|
|
restriction
|
|
<BR>
|
|
could be put in the backend (may need zero fills to pad to frontend
|
|
<BR>
|
|
requested
|
|
<BR>
|
|
size) or in the frontend by letting the user only select particular size
|
|
<BR>
|
|
areas.
|
|
<BR>
|
|
Glad to see so much activity on the snapscan backend.
|
|
<BR>
|
|
=======================================================
|
|
<BR>
|
|
Lawrence Glaister VE7IT email: <A HREF="mailto:lg@jfm.bc.ca?Subject=Re:%20[snapscan]%20Problem%20with%202.4.0-test10%20and%20AGFA%20SnapScan%201236S&In-Reply-To=<00a501c04850$63d411c0$bf0aa8c0@dufusiii>">lg@jfm.bc.ca</A>
|
|
<BR>
|
|
1462 Madrona Drive <A HREF="http://jfm.bc.ca">http://jfm.bc.ca</A>
|
|
<BR>
|
|
Nanoose Bay BC Canada
|
|
<BR>
|
|
V9P 9C9
|
|
<BR>
|
|
=======================================================
|
|
<BR>
|
|
----- Original Message -----
|
|
<BR>
|
|
From: Timothy Little <<A HREF="mailto:tim@lilly-villa.little-possums.net?Subject=Re:%20[snapscan]%20Problem%20with%202.4.0-test10%20and%20AGFA%20SnapScan%201236S&In-Reply-To=<00a501c04850$63d411c0$bf0aa8c0@dufusiii>">tim@lilly-villa.little-possums.net</A>>
|
|
<BR>
|
|
To: <<A HREF="mailto:sane-devel@mostang.com?Subject=Re:%20[snapscan]%20Problem%20with%202.4.0-test10%20and%20AGFA%20SnapScan%201236S&In-Reply-To=<00a501c04850$63d411c0$bf0aa8c0@dufusiii>">sane-devel@mostang.com</A>>
|
|
<BR>
|
|
Sent: Monday, November 06, 2000 1:13 PM
|
|
<BR>
|
|
Subject: Re: [snapscan] Problem with 2.4.0-test10 and AGFA SnapScan 1236S
|
|
<BR>
|
|
<P><P><EM>> On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 06:06:48PM +0100, Sebastien Sable wrote:
|
|
</EM><BR>
|
|
<EM>>
|
|
</EM><BR>
|
|
<EM>> > Could someone with one of those snapscan scanners not perfectly
|
|
</EM><BR>
|
|
<EM>> > working with 2.4-test try a 2.2 kernel (Timothy, Chris, Lawrence ?)?
|
|
</EM><BR>
|
|
<EM>>
|
|
</EM><BR>
|
|
<EM>> OK, just tried it out. The previously-reported problem is perfectly
|
|
</EM><BR>
|
|
<EM>> replicated in 2.2.15 with USB backport. Every res/width combination
|
|
</EM><BR>
|
|
<EM>> working in 2.4.0-test9 works in 2.2.15+usb, and every failure fails in
|
|
</EM><BR>
|
|
<EM>> both.
|
|
</EM><BR>
|
|
<EM>>
|
|
</EM><BR>
|
|
<EM>> Looks very much like a problem in the backend somewhere. Of course,
|
|
</EM><BR>
|
|
<EM>> it could also be a problem with the scanner capabilities, one that is
|
|
</EM><BR>
|
|
<EM>> worked around by Agfa's Windows driver :^)
|
|
</EM><BR>
|
|
<EM>>
|
|
</EM><BR>
|
|
<EM>>
|
|
</EM><BR>
|
|
<EM>> > Agfa 1212U
|
|
</EM><BR>
|
|
<EM>> > SNAPSCAN 1212U
|
|
</EM><BR>
|
|
<EM>> > Works sometime (but fails sometime?)
|
|
</EM><BR>
|
|
<EM>>
|
|
</EM><BR>
|
|
<EM>> 2.2.15 +USB, 2.4.0-test9
|
|
</EM><BR>
|
|
<EM>>
|
|
</EM><BR>
|
|
<EM>> > 600dpi
|
|
</EM><BR>
|
|
<EM>> > SNAPSCAN600P
|
|
</EM><BR>
|
|
<EM>>
|
|
</EM><BR>
|
|
<EM>>
|
|
</EM><BR>
|
|
<EM>> - Tim
|
|
</EM><BR>
|
|
<EM>>
|
|
</EM><BR>
|
|
<EM>> --
|
|
</EM><BR>
|
|
<EM>> Source code, list archive, and docs: <A HREF="http://www.mostang.com/sane/">http://www.mostang.com/sane/</A>
|
|
</EM><BR>
|
|
<EM>> To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail <A HREF="mailto:majordomo@mostang.com?Subject=Re:%20[snapscan]%20Problem%20with%202.4.0-test10%20and%20AGFA%20SnapScan%201236S&In-Reply-To=<00a501c04850$63d411c0$bf0aa8c0@dufusiii>">majordomo@mostang.com</A>
|
|
</EM><BR>
|
|
<EM>>
|
|
</EM><BR>
|
|
<P><P><PRE>
|
|
--
|
|
Source code, list archive, and docs: <A HREF="http://www.mostang.com/sane/">http://www.mostang.com/sane/</A>
|
|
To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail <A HREF="mailto:majordomo@mostang.com?Subject=Re:%20[snapscan]%20Problem%20with%202.4.0-test10%20and%20AGFA%20SnapScan%201236S&In-Reply-To=<00a501c04850$63d411c0$bf0aa8c0@dufusiii>">majordomo@mostang.com</A>
|
|
</PRE>
|
|
<P><!-- body="end" -->
|
|
<HR NOSHADE>
|
|
<UL>
|
|
<!-- next="start" -->
|
|
<LI><STRONG>Next message:</STRONG> <A HREF="0113.html">Russ Burdick: "Re: [snapscan] Problem with 2.4.0-test10 and AGFA SnapScan 1236S"</A>
|
|
<LI><STRONG>Previous message:</STRONG> <A HREF="0111.html">Henning Meier-Geinitz: "Re: detection problem"</A>
|
|
<LI><STRONG>In reply to:</STRONG> <A HREF="0107.html">Timothy Little: "Re: [snapscan] Problem with 2.4.0-test10 and AGFA SnapScan 1236S"</A>
|
|
<!-- nextthread="start" -->
|
|
<LI><STRONG>Next in thread:</STRONG> <A HREF="0113.html">Russ Burdick: "Re: [snapscan] Problem with 2.4.0-test10 and AGFA SnapScan 1236S"</A>
|
|
<!-- reply="end" -->
|
|
<LI><STRONG>Messages sorted by:</STRONG>
|
|
<A HREF="date.html#112">[ date ]</A>
|
|
<A HREF="index.html#112">[ thread ]</A>
|
|
<A HREF="subject.html#112">[ subject ]</A>
|
|
<A HREF="author.html#112">[ author ]</A>
|
|
</UL>
|
|
<!-- trailer="footer" -->
|
|
<HR NOSHADE>
|
|
<P>
|
|
<SMALL>
|
|
<EM>
|
|
This archive was generated by <A HREF="http://www.hypermail.org/">hypermail 2b29</A>
|
|
: <EM>Mon Nov 06 2000 - 16:14:23 PST</EM>
|
|
</EM>
|
|
</SMALL>
|
|
</BODY>
|
|
</HTML>
|