sane-project-website/old-archive/1999-12/0205.html

84 wiersze
3.6 KiB
HTML

This file contains invisible Unicode characters!

This file contains invisible Unicode characters that may be processed differently from what appears below. If your use case is intentional and legitimate, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal hidden characters.

<!-- received="Thu Dec 30 15:49:58 1999 PST" -->
<!-- sent="Thu, 30 Dec 1999 18:55:42 -0500 (EST)" -->
<!-- name="Warren Chartier" -->
<!-- email="icebalm@bigfoot.com" -->
<!-- subject="RE: IBM IdeaScan" -->
<!-- id="" -->
<!-- inreplyto="0FNK00CI9V26FR@longneck.netc.pt" -->
<title>sane-devel: RE: IBM IdeaScan</title>
<h1>RE: IBM IdeaScan</h1>
<b>Warren Chartier</b> (<a href="mailto:icebalm@bigfoot.com"><i>icebalm@bigfoot.com</i></a>)<br>
<i>Thu, 30 Dec 1999 18:55:42 -0500 (EST)</i>
<p>
<ul>
<li> <b>Messages sorted by:</b> <a href="date.html#205">[ date ]</a><a href="index.html#205">[ thread ]</a><a href="subject.html#205">[ subject ]</a><a href="author.html#205">[ author ]</a>
<!-- next="start" -->
<li> <b>Next message:</b> <a href="0206.html">Paulo Abreu: "RE: IBM IdeaScan"</a>
<li> <b>Previous message:</b> <a href="0204.html">Paulo Abreu: "RE: IBM IdeaScan"</a>
<!-- nextthread="start" -->
<!-- reply="end" -->
</ul>
<!-- body="start" -->
Hi there Paulo,<br>
<p>
Well I dont know for sure if thats the case for your particular scanner,<br>
however my Microtek SlimScan C3 is a parallel port scanner which uses SCSI<br>
over Parallel, and I've used ppSCSI to get it working with SANE.<br>
<p>
One of the easiest tell tale signs is to look at how the windows drivers<br>
work. Mine even have a SCSI style probe function where it probes SCSI<br>
ID's to find my scanner (always on ID 5), however I don't have a SCSI<br>
adaptor in the computer!<br>
<p>
The reason its cheaper? People with SCSI usually have more money so<br>
manufacturers gouge them. :P<br>
<p>
Good Luck,<br>
<p>
Warren Chartier<br>
Minister of the Mobile Mechanized Infantry - <a href="http://www.juga.com">http://www.juga.com</a><br>
Fight Spam - Join CAUSE! <a href="http://www.cause.org">http://www.cause.org</a><br>
<p>
---- BEGIN ECHELON BLOCK ----<br>
SCUD missile Ortega AK-47 Uzi $400 million in gold bullion Rule Psix Nazi<br>
militia Project Monarch counter-intelligence JFK cypherpunk Kibo Ron Brown<br>
clones bomb special-ops terrorism WACO nuclear missile MI5<br>
----- END ECHELON BLOCK -----<br>
<p>
On Fri, 31 Dec 1999, Paulo Abreu wrote:<br>
<p>
<i>&gt; It seems the link points to some module to enable the use of a scsi adapter </i><br>
<i>&gt; that's connected to a parallel port. Let me see if I'm getting this </i><br>
<i>&gt; straight (100% newbie here, so be patient):</i><br>
<i>&gt; 1. I have this parallel port scanner xyz1000P that doesn't have a sane </i><br>
<i>&gt; backend yet.</i><br>
<i>&gt; 2. There's a sane backend for its scsi cousin, the xyz1000SC.</i><br>
<i>&gt; 3. Then, probably the xyz1000P is just a xyz1000SC with some kind of </i><br>
<i>&gt; parallel port scsi adapter inside. If I know the adapter, I'll be able to </i><br>
<i>&gt; use this module to use a scsi driver to control a parport model.</i><br>
<i>&gt; </i><br>
<i>&gt; Is this correct? If it is, why was my parallel port scanner much cheaper </i><br>
<i>&gt; then the scsi cousin? It has more hw inside (scsi+parport converter)!</i><br>
<i>&gt; </i><br>
<i>&gt; If it isn't, can you explain a bit more?</i><br>
<i>&gt; </i><br>
<i>&gt; TIA</i><br>
<i>&gt; </i><br>
<i>&gt; Paulo</i><br>
<p>
<p>
<pre>
--
Source code, list archive, and docs: <a href="http://www.mostang.com/sane/">http://www.mostang.com/sane/</a>
To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail <a href="mailto:majordomo@mostang.com">majordomo@mostang.com</a>
</pre>
<!-- body="end" -->
<p>
<ul>
<!-- next="start" -->
<li> <b>Next message:</b> <a href="0206.html">Paulo Abreu: "RE: IBM IdeaScan"</a>
<li> <b>Previous message:</b> <a href="0204.html">Paulo Abreu: "RE: IBM IdeaScan"</a>
<!-- nextthread="start" -->
<!-- reply="end" -->
</ul>