sane-project-website/old-archive/1999-11/0226.html

63 wiersze
3.0 KiB
HTML

This file contains invisible Unicode characters!

This file contains invisible Unicode characters that may be processed differently from what appears below. If your use case is intentional and legitimate, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal hidden characters.

<!-- received="Tue Nov 23 13:07:17 1999 PST" -->
<!-- sent="Tue, 23 Nov 1999 13:08:45 -0800" -->
<!-- name="Vincent Parrilla" -->
<!-- email="parrilla@ix.netcom.com" -->
<!-- subject="Re: Experiences comparing/improving UMAX scans, Sane vs VistaScan" -->
<!-- id="" -->
<!-- inreplyto="Experiences comparing/improving UMAX scans, Sane vs VistaScan" -->
<title>sane-devel: Re: Experiences comparing/improving UMAX scans, Sane vs VistaScan</title>
<h1>Re: Experiences comparing/improving UMAX scans, Sane vs VistaScan</h1>
<b>Vincent Parrilla</b> (<a href="mailto:parrilla@ix.netcom.com"><i>parrilla@ix.netcom.com</i></a>)<br>
<i>Tue, 23 Nov 1999 13:08:45 -0800</i>
<p>
<ul>
<li> <b>Messages sorted by:</b> <a href="date.html#226">[ date ]</a><a href="index.html#226">[ thread ]</a><a href="subject.html#226">[ subject ]</a><a href="author.html#226">[ author ]</a>
<!-- next="start" -->
<li> <b>Next message:</b> <a href="0227.html">Bill Thompson: "Epson Perfection 1200-SCSI Scanner"</a>
<li> <b>Previous message:</b> <a href="0225.html">Rod Pike: "Experiences comparing/improving UMAX scans, Sane vs VistaScan outputs"</a>
<!-- nextthread="start" -->
<!-- reply="end" -->
</ul>
<!-- body="start" -->
For what's its worth, I am running a UMAX 1220s on my Linux box using<br>
SANE1.0.1, Gimp(?) and xscanimage 0.39 and am getting excellent results.<br>
I haven't noticed any horizontal lines - but will look closer.<br>
<p>
Vince Parrilla<br>
<p>
<p>
<i>&gt; Greetings,</i><br>
<i>&gt;</i><br>
<i>&gt; I'm trying to get Sane to provide me as good an output that I'm getting</i><br>
<i>&gt; from the UMAX supplied drivers for my 1220S. I'm not sure if it's</i><br>
<i>&gt; something I'm doing wrong, something misconfigured, or magic that the</i><br>
<i>&gt; Windows drivers are doing but I'm getting much cleaner scans for the same</i><br>
<i>&gt; dpi (300) from my scanner using the Windows interface. The output I get</i><br>
<i>&gt; using xscanimage have very faint horizontal lines.</i><br>
<i>&gt;</i><br>
<i>&gt; I'm using SANE 1.0.1 and Gimp 1.0.4. I really would prefer to stick to one</i><br>
<i>&gt; OS for scanning and editing.</i><br>
<i>&gt;</i><br>
<i>&gt; Cheers,</i><br>
<i>&gt; Rod</i><br>
<i>&gt;</i><br>
<i>&gt; --</i><br>
<i>&gt; Source code, list archive, and docs: <a href="http://www.mostang.com/sane/">http://www.mostang.com/sane/</a></i><br>
<i>&gt; To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail <a href="mailto:majordomo@mostang.com">majordomo@mostang.com</a></i><br>
<p>
<p>
<pre>
--
Source code, list archive, and docs: <a href="http://www.mostang.com/sane/">http://www.mostang.com/sane/</a>
To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail <a href="mailto:majordomo@mostang.com">majordomo@mostang.com</a>
</pre>
<!-- body="end" -->
<p>
<ul>
<!-- next="start" -->
<li> <b>Next message:</b> <a href="0227.html">Bill Thompson: "Epson Perfection 1200-SCSI Scanner"</a>
<li> <b>Previous message:</b> <a href="0225.html">Rod Pike: "Experiences comparing/improving UMAX scans, Sane vs VistaScan outputs"</a>
<!-- nextthread="start" -->
<!-- reply="end" -->
</ul>