sane-project-website/old-archive/1999-10/0134.html

68 wiersze
2.6 KiB
HTML

This file contains invisible Unicode characters!

This file contains invisible Unicode characters that may be processed differently from what appears below. If your use case is intentional and legitimate, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal hidden characters.

<!-- received="Mon Oct 18 11:54:55 1999 PDT" -->
<!-- sent="Mon, 18 Oct 1999 20:57:34 +0200 (MEST)" -->
<!-- name="Karl-Heinz Guenster" -->
<!-- email="Karl-Heinz.Guenster@t-online.de" -->
<!-- subject="Re: problem getting a snapscan to work" -->
<!-- id="" -->
<!-- inreplyto="380B19FB.16A14F09@gate.verona.se" -->
<title>sane-devel: Re: problem getting a snapscan to work</title>
<h1>Re: problem getting a snapscan to work</h1>
<b>Karl-Heinz Guenster</b> (<a href="mailto:Karl-Heinz.Guenster@t-online.de"><i>Karl-Heinz.Guenster@t-online.de</i></a>)<br>
<i>Mon, 18 Oct 1999 20:57:34 +0200 (MEST)</i>
<p>
<ul>
<li> <b>Messages sorted by:</b> <a href="date.html#134">[ date ]</a><a href="index.html#134">[ thread ]</a><a href="subject.html#134">[ subject ]</a><a href="author.html#134">[ author ]</a>
<!-- next="start" -->
<li> <b>Next message:</b> <a href="0135.html">Eduardo Mazoni Andrade Marcal Mendes: "Re: Can a scanner be faster on Windows 98 than on Linux?"</a>
<li> <b>Previous message:</b> <a href="0133.html">Oliver Rauch: "Re: Can a scanner be faster on Windows 98 than on Linux?"</a>
<!-- nextthread="start" -->
<!-- reply="end" -->
</ul>
<!-- body="start" -->
On 18-Oct-99 joakim verona wrote:<br>
<p>
Hi Joakim,<br>
<p>
[...]<br>
<p>
<i>&gt; it now strikes me that the problem might be that the scanner needs</i><br>
<i>&gt; termination,</i><br>
<i>&gt; but it's unclear how to do this, because the scanner has one db25</i><br>
<i>&gt; port</i><br>
<i>&gt; and one centronics</i><br>
<i>&gt; port. any snapscan users who now if it needs termination?</i><br>
<p>
It's different. My Snapscan needs an active termination on Adaptec<br>
2940, but on my Adaptec 1560 no active and no passive termination can<br>
help, only another scanner with termination inside will get them<br>
running.<br>
<p>
I think, you should test active terminators.<br>
<p>
Greetings<br>
Karl-Heinz<br>
<p>
<pre>
--
E-Mail: Karl-Heinz Guenster &lt;<a href="mailto:karl-heinz.guenster@t-online.de">karl-heinz.guenster@t-online.de</a>&gt;
Date: 18-Oct-99
Time: 17:58:43
<p>
<pre>
--
<p>
<pre>
--
Source code, list archive, and docs: <a href="http://www.mostang.com/sane/">http://www.mostang.com/sane/</a>
To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail <a href="mailto:majordomo@mostang.com">majordomo@mostang.com</a>
</pre>
<!-- body="end" -->
<p>
<ul>
<!-- next="start" -->
<li> <b>Next message:</b> <a href="0135.html">Eduardo Mazoni Andrade Marcal Mendes: "Re: Can a scanner be faster on Windows 98 than on Linux?"</a>
<li> <b>Previous message:</b> <a href="0133.html">Oliver Rauch: "Re: Can a scanner be faster on Windows 98 than on Linux?"</a>
<!-- nextthread="start" -->
<!-- reply="end" -->
</ul>