sane-project-website/old-archive/1999-09/0188.html

124 wiersze
5.4 KiB
HTML

<!-- received="Wed Sep 29 10:34:58 1999 PDT" -->
<!-- sent="Wed, 29 Sep 1999 13:40:01 -0400" -->
<!-- name="Mitchell, Sean" -->
<!-- email="mitchell@chrs.com" -->
<!-- subject="RE: Mustek MFS 6000CX Problems" -->
<!-- id="99Sep29.133016edt.26897@gateway.chrs.com" -->
<!-- inreplyto="" -->
<title>sane-devel: RE: Mustek MFS 6000CX Problems</title>
<h1>RE: Mustek MFS 6000CX Problems</h1>
<b>Mitchell, Sean</b> (<a href="mailto:mitchell@chrs.com"><i>mitchell@chrs.com</i></a>)<br>
<i>Wed, 29 Sep 1999 13:40:01 -0400</i>
<p>
<ul>
<li> <b>Messages sorted by:</b> <a href="date.html#188">[ date ]</a><a href="index.html#188">[ thread ]</a><a href="subject.html#188">[ subject ]</a><a href="author.html#188">[ author ]</a>
<!-- next="start" -->
<li> <b>Next message:</b> <a href="0189.html">Christian Ordig: "RE: Primax Profi 19200"</a>
<li> <b>Previous message:</b> <a href="0187.html">Oliver Rauch: "xsane-0.37"</a>
<!-- nextthread="start" -->
<!-- reply="end" -->
</ul>
<!-- body="start" -->
-----Original Message-----<br>
From: Andreas Beck [<a href="mailto:becka@rz.uni-duesseldorf.de">mailto:becka@rz.uni-duesseldorf.de</a>]<br>
Subject: Re: Mustek MFS 6000CX Problems<br>
<p>
<i>&gt;&gt; I've been using SANE with some success on Linux-2.2.x with a Mustek </i><br>
<i>&gt;&gt; MFS 6000CX and a AHA-1542C. I've got xscanimage working, but it will</i><br>
<i>&gt;&gt; not scan at resolutions higher than 300dpi. When I try to set it to </i><br>
<i>&gt;&gt; 600dpi (the max allowable in xscanimage) it scans at what appears to </i><br>
<i>&gt;&gt; be the default resolution of somewhat less than 300dpi. </i><br>
<p>
<i>&gt; That sounds like a bug in the driver. However:</i><br>
<p>
Gack! How do I submit a bug report? Would it be worth anyone's while for me<br>
to look though the code myself... I'm thinking that this would not be an<br>
obvious bug or it would have bitten other Mustek users before now. <br>
<p>
<i>&gt; No. The 6000 series has an optical resolution of 600x300dpi. the </i><br>
<i>&gt; naming convention for Mustek scanners is [dpi]0[Type].</i><br>
<i>&gt; Where [dpi] is the vertical (stepping) resolution, which is twice </i><br>
<i>&gt; the horizontal (CCD) resolution.</i><br>
<p>
Ah. That's useful to know. I've long since lost any manuals that came with<br>
the Mustek, so I wasn't sure what it could do. I did remember that it was<br>
better than the Plustek it replaced, which was capable of up to 300dpi. In<br>
the Windoze dialogue that comes up it shows resolutions up to 1200 dpi, then<br>
a separator, and then 2400 and 4800. That's what my assumptions were based<br>
on (although it did seem a little to good to be true!).<br>
<p>
<i>&gt;&gt; I thought perhaps I could get around this by using scanimage, </i><br>
<p>
<i>&gt; No. If xscanimage offers the option, it basically does the same </i><br>
<i>&gt; scanimage would do. The backend imposes restrictions on options in </i><br>
<i>&gt; SANE, not the frontend (with the exception of possible bugs of </i><br>
<i>&gt; course).</i><br>
<p>
But possibly the error is in how xscanimage calls the API (or scanimage),<br>
not in the driver or scanimage itself?<br>
<p>
<i>&gt;&gt; but I cannot find any documentation on how to specify resolution or </i><br>
<i>&gt;&gt; the area to scan.</i><br>
<p>
<i>&gt; scanimage -h will help you out :-).</i><br>
<p>
I did try that but all I got was<br>
<p>
Usage: scanimage [OPTION]...<br>
<p>
Start image acquisition on a scanner device and write PNM image data to<br>
standard output.<br>
<p>
-d, --device-name=DEVICE use a given scanner device<br>
-h, --help display this help message and exit<br>
-L, --list-devices show available scanner devices<br>
-T, --test test backend thoroughly<br>
-v, --verbose give even more status messages<br>
-V, --version print version information<br>
<p>
<p>
<i>&gt; Eventually -L might be useful to list the found devices and -d to </i><br>
<i>&gt; select one of them.</i><br>
<p>
Hmm.. maybe I misunderstood. Perhaps I should have used "scanimage -h<br>
--device-name=mustek" (i forget at the moment the device convention, but..)<br>
instead of just "scanimage -h" to get device specifc help?<br>
<p>
<p>
<i>&gt; Try the options --resolution, -x and -y (width and height, it will</i><br>
<i>&gt; understand units) -l and -t (left and top border to skip).</i><br>
<p>
Thanks! Do you know offhand where/if these option are documented? I searched<br>
and grepped to no avail!<br>
<p>
<p>
Anyone else Out There using a Mustek 6000CX with SANE and getting &gt;300dpi?<br>
<p>
Cheers,<br>
<p>
Sean<br>
<p>
<p>
<p>
-------------------------------------------------------<br>
Sean Mitchell email: <a href="mailto:mitchell@chrs.com">mitchell@chrs.com</a> <br>
Software Quality Engineer phone: 519-672-0745 x224<br>
TradeMart Technologies fax: 519-679-3943<br>
-------------------------------------------------------<br>
<p>
<p>
<pre>
--
Source code, list archive, and docs: <a href="http://www.mostang.com/sane/">http://www.mostang.com/sane/</a>
To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail <a href="mailto:majordomo@mostang.com">majordomo@mostang.com</a>
</pre>
<!-- body="end" -->
<p>
<ul>
<!-- next="start" -->
<li> <b>Next message:</b> <a href="0189.html">Christian Ordig: "RE: Primax Profi 19200"</a>
<li> <b>Previous message:</b> <a href="0187.html">Oliver Rauch: "xsane-0.37"</a>
<!-- nextthread="start" -->
<!-- reply="end" -->
</ul>