sane-project-website/old-archive/1999-05/0169.html

71 wiersze
3.1 KiB
HTML

This file contains invisible Unicode characters!

This file contains invisible Unicode characters that may be processed differently from what appears below. If your use case is intentional and legitimate, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal hidden characters.

<!-- received="Tue May 18 03:20:10 1999 PDT" -->
<!-- sent="Tue, 18 May 1999 12:25:19 +0200" -->
<!-- name="Ewald R. de Wit" -->
<!-- email="ewald@pobox.com" -->
<!-- subject="Re: Coolscan LS-30 + best scanner" -->
<!-- id="" -->
<!-- inreplyto="37410F1D.7366741C@gemse.fr" -->
<title>sane-devel: Re: Coolscan LS-30 + best scanner</title>
<h1>Re: Coolscan LS-30 + best scanner</h1>
<b>Ewald R. de Wit</b> (<a href="mailto:ewald@pobox.com"><i>ewald@pobox.com</i></a>)<br>
<i>Tue, 18 May 1999 12:25:19 +0200</i>
<p>
<ul>
<li> <b>Messages sorted by:</b> <a href="date.html#169">[ date ]</a><a href="index.html#169">[ thread ]</a><a href="subject.html#169">[ subject ]</a><a href="author.html#169">[ author ]</a>
<!-- next="start" -->
<li> <b>Next message:</b> <a href="0170.html">Jeffrey Thompson: "Relisys Scorpio Super III"</a>
<li> <b>Previous message:</b> <a href="0168.html">Wolfgang Cohrs: "xsane not running"</a>
<li> <b>In reply to:</b> <a href="0166.html">Andreas Rick: "Re: Coolscan LS-30 + best scanner"</a>
<!-- nextthread="start" -->
<!-- reply="end" -->
</ul>
<!-- body="start" -->
Andreas Rick (<a href="mailto:rickand@gemse.fr">rickand@gemse.fr</a>) wrote:<br>
<p>
<i>&gt; Should I define a new image frame format like SANE_FRAME_RGBI</i><br>
<i>&gt; for RedGreenBlueInfrared ?</i><br>
<i>&gt; The Viewscan software allows 40-bit (10bits*(R+B+G+I)) scans.</i><br>
<p>
Yes, just put the SANE_FRAME_RGBI in sane.h and hope it<br>
will be made official later on..<br>
<p>
When I suggested this some time ago someone replied that that the RGBI<br>
term was already used in the videoworld and that this might lead to <br>
confusion. However, when doing a websearch on RGBI it does not appear<br>
to be used extensively for that (most hits where for old Commodore<br>
monitors). So in the context of scanners/imaging devices it shouldn't<br>
be too confusive.<br>
<p>
<i>&gt; This way the actual scanning time should be slower</i><br>
<i>&gt; (during this time we require a lot of user interaction like selecting</i><br>
<i>&gt; the scanning area and some color/brightness adjustments)</i><br>
<i>&gt; and we could do the dust-removal offline in a big batch on</i><br>
<i>&gt; all the image scanned.</i><br>
<p>
That would be a good idea if you want to batch scan hundreds of<br>
slides. But probably most people would like to get just one or a few<br>
images as quickly as possible into the Gimp. For that it would <br>
be nessacary to include the dust removal code also into the backend.<br>
<p>
<pre>
--
-- Ewald
<p>
<p>
<p>
<pre>
--
Source code, list archive, and docs: <a href="http://www.mostang.com/sane/">http://www.mostang.com/sane/</a>
To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail <a href="mailto:majordomo@mostang.com">majordomo@mostang.com</a>
</pre>
<!-- body="end" -->
<p>
<ul>
<!-- next="start" -->
<li> <b>Next message:</b> <a href="0170.html">Jeffrey Thompson: "Relisys Scorpio Super III"</a>
<li> <b>Previous message:</b> <a href="0168.html">Wolfgang Cohrs: "xsane not running"</a>
<li> <b>In reply to:</b> <a href="0166.html">Andreas Rick: "Re: Coolscan LS-30 + best scanner"</a>
<!-- nextthread="start" -->
<!-- reply="end" -->
</ul>