sane-project-website/old-archive/1999-04/0351.html

75 wiersze
3.5 KiB
HTML

This file contains invisible Unicode characters!

This file contains invisible Unicode characters that may be processed differently from what appears below. If your use case is intentional and legitimate, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal hidden characters.

<!-- received="Sat Apr 24 16:19:57 1999 PDT" -->
<!-- sent="Sat, 24 Apr 1999 19:43:22 -0400 (EDT)" -->
<!-- name="Tripp Lilley" -->
<!-- email="tlilley@perspex.com" -->
<!-- subject="Re: lineart vrs greyscale" -->
<!-- id="" -->
<!-- inreplyto="Pine.LNX.3.96.990424165453.8308A-100000@chef.ecs.soton.ac.uk" -->
<title>sane-devel: Re: lineart vrs greyscale</title>
<h1>Re: lineart vrs greyscale</h1>
<b>Tripp Lilley</b> (<a href="mailto:tlilley@perspex.com"><i>tlilley@perspex.com</i></a>)<br>
<i>Sat, 24 Apr 1999 19:43:22 -0400 (EDT)</i>
<p>
<ul>
<li> <b>Messages sorted by:</b> <a href="date.html#351">[ date ]</a><a href="index.html#351">[ thread ]</a><a href="subject.html#351">[ subject ]</a><a href="author.html#351">[ author ]</a>
<!-- next="start" -->
<li> <b>Next message:</b> <a href="0352.html">Jay Smith: "Big Picture Camera"</a>
<li> <b>Previous message:</b> <a href="0350.html">Bob van der Poel: "Re: lineart vrs greyscale"</a>
<!-- nextthread="start" -->
<!-- reply="end" -->
</ul>
<!-- body="start" -->
On Sat, 24 Apr 1999, Nick Lamb wrote:<br>
<p>
<i>&gt; To the human eye greyscale will always look better because it reduces</i><br>
<i>&gt; aliasing. So if you're just going to look at the results (or use an</i><br>
<i>&gt; algorithm which permits greyscale) you should use greyscale.</i><br>
<i>&gt; </i><br>
<i>&gt; The other advantage of line art is that it returns much less data (of</i><br>
<i>&gt; course 8 times less normally, or better with RLE) and so can be saved</i><br>
<i>&gt; to a smaller file and transmitted more quickly over SCSI. This might be</i><br>
<i>&gt; important for scanning A4 documents at high resolution quickly.</i><br>
<p>
Though greyscale is certainly better for legibility, if you're planning on<br>
archiving the documents, you'll want to futz around with the<br>
brightness/contrast settings as mentioned, and stick with lineart. The<br>
reason, in a nutshell, is that Group 4 Compression (FAX, TIFF, etc.) is<br>
the "best compromise" compression for archival storage, and it only does<br>
BW (ie: lineart).<br>
<p>
I say it's the "best compromise" because it's not /exactly/ a "general<br>
purpose" compression algorithm. It was designed for FAX transmission, and<br>
the designers chose certain constant parameters of the algorithm based on<br>
statistical analysis of lots of images of text documents in European<br>
languages. So it doesn't do quite as well on a BW scan of a full page<br>
magazine ad as it would on a full page of magazine text.<br>
<p>
In any case, TIFF or CALS with G4 compression is by far the most pervasive<br>
encoding in archival document management systems.<br>
<p>
<p>
<pre>
--
Tripp Lilley + Innovative Workflow Engineering, Inc. + (<a href="mailto:tripp@iweinc.com">tripp@iweinc.com</a>)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"It all comes from health and good nutrition, and not just from
giving them a nice bath before the show."
<p>
- Mary Papadopoulos, on horses showing well
<p>
<p>
<pre>
--
Source code, list archive, and docs: <a href="http://www.mostang.com/sane/">http://www.mostang.com/sane/</a>
To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail <a href="mailto:majordomo@mostang.com">majordomo@mostang.com</a>
</pre>
<!-- body="end" -->
<p>
<ul>
<!-- next="start" -->
<li> <b>Next message:</b> <a href="0352.html">Jay Smith: "Big Picture Camera"</a>
<li> <b>Previous message:</b> <a href="0350.html">Bob van der Poel: "Re: lineart vrs greyscale"</a>
<!-- nextthread="start" -->
<!-- reply="end" -->
</ul>