sane-project-website/old-archive/1999-02/0224.html

62 wiersze
3.0 KiB
HTML

<!-- received="Sun Feb 28 10:31:27 1999 PST" -->
<!-- sent="Sun, 28 Feb 1999 10:31:14 -0800" -->
<!-- name="David Mosberger-Tang" -->
<!-- email="David.Mosberger@acm.org" -->
<!-- subject="Re: Porting SANE backends" -->
<!-- id="199902281831.KAA01895@panda.mostang.com" -->
<!-- inreplyto="36D5D35E.990ADB1B@wolfsburg.de" -->
<title>sane-devel: Re: Porting SANE backends</title>
<h1>Re: Porting SANE backends</h1>
<b>David Mosberger-Tang</b> (<a href="mailto:David.Mosberger@acm.org"><i>David.Mosberger@acm.org</i></a>)<br>
<i>Sun, 28 Feb 1999 10:31:14 -0800</i>
<p>
<ul>
<li> <b>Messages sorted by:</b> <a href="date.html#224">[ date ]</a><a href="index.html#224">[ thread ]</a><a href="subject.html#224">[ subject ]</a><a href="author.html#224">[ author ]</a>
<!-- next="start" -->
<li> <b>Next message:</b> <a href="0225.html">David Mosberger-Tang: "Re: 16-bit frames and interleaving"</a>
<li> <b>Previous message:</b> <a href="0223.html">becka@rz.uni-duesseldorf.de: "Re: Info Peripherals' ImageReaderISA"</a>
<!-- nextthread="start" -->
<!-- reply="end" -->
</ul>
<!-- body="start" -->
<i>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; On Sun, 28 Feb 1999 18:21:32 +0200, Milon Firikis &lt;<a href="mailto:milonf@ariadne-t.gr">milonf@ariadne-t.gr</a>&gt; said:</i><br>
<p>
Milon&gt; Note that the objective is to hide all Unix specific<br>
Milon&gt; functions from the backend much like the sanei_scsi_ routines<br>
Milon&gt; do for scsi operations.<br>
<p>
You're wrong. Yes, the _API_ must be OS independent but the sample<br>
implementation that we distribute is developed and intended for<br>
POSIX-compatible systems. If we can port that source to other<br>
platforms easily and cleanly, great, but to say that we want to hide<br>
all UNIX/POSIX specific functions is silly.<br>
<p>
The issue with fork() is that it's hard (inefficient) to implement on<br>
any system that doesn't have virtual memory. However, threads do not<br>
necessarily solve the problem either. E.g., on systems supporting<br>
user-level threads only (e.g., SunOS, HP-UX up to 10.20, etc.), a<br>
thread may not even help for SANE backends.<br>
<p>
Anyhow, if someone modifies the backends to abstract fork() in an<br>
elegant way, I'd be happy to merge in such patches. But if it can't<br>
be done cleanly, you'd be better of creating and maintaining your own<br>
SANE implementation. It's perfectly OK to have multiple SANE<br>
implementations as long as they can interoperate.<br>
<p>
--david<br>
<p>
<pre>
--
Source code, list archive, and docs: <a href="http://www.mostang.com/sane/">http://www.mostang.com/sane/</a>
To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail <a href="mailto:majordomo@mostang.com">majordomo@mostang.com</a>
</pre>
<!-- body="end" -->
<p>
<ul>
<!-- next="start" -->
<li> <b>Next message:</b> <a href="0225.html">David Mosberger-Tang: "Re: 16-bit frames and interleaving"</a>
<li> <b>Previous message:</b> <a href="0223.html">becka@rz.uni-duesseldorf.de: "Re: Info Peripherals' ImageReaderISA"</a>
<!-- nextthread="start" -->
<!-- reply="end" -->
</ul>