kopia lustrzana https://gitlab.com/sane-project/website
87 wiersze
3.9 KiB
HTML
87 wiersze
3.9 KiB
HTML
<!-- received="Sun Nov 29 22:11:45 1998 PST" -->
|
||
<!-- sent="Mon, 30 Nov 1998 01:19:12 -0500 (EST)" -->
|
||
<!-- name="Christian Grigis" -->
|
||
<!-- email="glove@earthling.net" -->
|
||
<!-- subject="Re: Patch for Microtek ScanMaker X6 (microtek2 backend)" -->
|
||
<!-- id="" -->
|
||
<!-- inreplyto="19981121165419.3278.qmail@aquila.muc.de" -->
|
||
<title>sane-devel: Re: Patch for Microtek ScanMaker X6 (microtek2 backend)</title>
|
||
<h1>Re: Patch for Microtek ScanMaker X6 (microtek2 backend)</h1>
|
||
<b>Christian Grigis</b> (<a href="mailto:glove@earthling.net"><i>glove@earthling.net</i></a>)<br>
|
||
<i>Mon, 30 Nov 1998 01:19:12 -0500 (EST)</i>
|
||
<p>
|
||
<ul>
|
||
<li> <b>Messages sorted by:</b> <a href="date.html#290">[ date ]</a><a href="index.html#290">[ thread ]</a><a href="subject.html#290">[ subject ]</a><a href="author.html#290">[ author ]</a>
|
||
<!-- next="start" -->
|
||
<li> <b>Next message:</b> <a href="0291.html">Pkirchg@aol.com: "Re: problem with HP C6270A (Scanjet ADF) using ADF"</a>
|
||
<li> <b>Previous message:</b> <a href="0289.html">Christopher J. Tearpak: "Re: SANE 1.00 breaks on Solaris v2.6"</a>
|
||
<!-- nextthread="start" -->
|
||
<!-- reply="end" -->
|
||
</ul>
|
||
<!-- body="start" -->
|
||
Hello (and sorry for the late reply),<br>
|
||
<p>
|
||
On Sat, 21 Nov 1998, Bernd Schroeder wrote:<br>
|
||
<p>
|
||
<i>> > I just acquired a ScanMaker X6EL, and I noticed the same strange</i><br>
|
||
<i>> > behavior: the scanned image is OK after a powercycle, but the following</i><br>
|
||
<i>> > scans result in "weird" colors. </i><br>
|
||
<i>> > I have not had time to investigate the problem so far, but here is</i><br>
|
||
<i>> > some additional info: </i><br>
|
||
<i>> </i><br>
|
||
<i>> I think it is not the same problem, it is more or less the other way</i><br>
|
||
<i>> round.</i><br>
|
||
<p>
|
||
Yes, sorry, it is indeed a different problem.<br>
|
||
<p>
|
||
<i>> Can you try the following: when the colors are wrong, do a lineart scan,</i><br>
|
||
<i>> and then again a color scan. It would be interesting to know, whether</i><br>
|
||
<i>> the colors are correct again (at least for one scan). Some models</i><br>
|
||
<i>> show this behaviour, and the current workaround is to set up the parameters</i><br>
|
||
<p>
|
||
Indeed, that behaviour is shown by the X6EL as well ...<br>
|
||
<p>
|
||
<i>> for a B/W scan before every scan and scan one line (or zero lines</i><br>
|
||
<i>> in the next release). This is, what do_dummy_scan() does</i><br>
|
||
<i>> (see the discussion in the other thread).</i><br>
|
||
<p>
|
||
Yes! Modifying do_dummy_scan() to execute for my model also (FW<br>
|
||
1.30) fixed the problem (perhaps the test should be "<= 1.30" ?) :<br>
|
||
<p>
|
||
--- microtek2.c.back Thu Nov 19 22:36:26 1998<br>
|
||
+++ microtek2.c Mon Nov 30 00:53:58 1998<br>
|
||
@@ -1989,7 +1989,9 @@<br>
|
||
if ( ! ( md->info[MD_SOURCE_FLATBED].model_code == 0x97<br>
|
||
&& md->revision == 1.00 )<br>
|
||
&& ! ( md->info[MD_SOURCE_FLATBED].model_code == 0x91<br>
|
||
- && md->revision == 1.00 ) )<br>
|
||
+ && md->revision == 1.00 )<br>
|
||
+ && ! ( md->info[MD_SOURCE_FLATBED].model_code == 0x98<br>
|
||
+ && md->revision == 1.30 ) )<br>
|
||
return SANE_STATUS_GOOD;<br>
|
||
<br>
|
||
DBG(30, "do_dummy_scan: ms=%p\n", ms);<br>
|
||
<p>
|
||
<p>
|
||
I guess the X6EL can be considered as a supported model by now :) .<br>
|
||
<p>
|
||
Thanks Bernd!<br>
|
||
<p>
|
||
-Christian<br>
|
||
<p>
|
||
<p>
|
||
<pre>
|
||
--
|
||
Source code, list archive, and docs: <a href="http://www.mostang.com/sane/">http://www.mostang.com/sane/</a>
|
||
To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail <a href="mailto:majordomo@mostang.com">majordomo@mostang.com</a>
|
||
</pre>
|
||
<!-- body="end" -->
|
||
<p>
|
||
<ul>
|
||
<!-- next="start" -->
|
||
<li> <b>Next message:</b> <a href="0291.html">Pkirchg@aol.com: "Re: problem with HP C6270A (Scanjet ADF) using ADF"</a>
|
||
<li> <b>Previous message:</b> <a href="0289.html">Christopher J. Tearpak: "Re: SANE 1.00 breaks on Solaris v2.6"</a>
|
||
<!-- nextthread="start" -->
|
||
<!-- reply="end" -->
|
||
</ul>
|