sane-project-website/old-archive/1998-11/0174.html

102 wiersze
5.4 KiB
HTML

<!-- received="Thu Nov 19 19:14:39 1998 PST" -->
<!-- sent="Fri, 20 Nov 1998 01:53:12 +0100 (MET)" -->
<!-- name="becka@rz.uni-duesseldorf.de" -->
<!-- email="becka@rz.uni-duesseldorf.de" -->
<!-- subject="Re: forwarded message from Richard Stallman" -->
<!-- id="m0zgeoy-000CF6C@hades.beck-sw.de" -->
<!-- inreplyto="199811192130.QAA31575@tristan.devel.redhat.com" -->
<title>sane-devel: Re: forwarded message from Richard Stallman</title>
<h1>Re: forwarded message from Richard Stallman</h1>
<a href="mailto:becka@rz.uni-duesseldorf.de"><i>becka@rz.uni-duesseldorf.de</i></a><br>
<i>Fri, 20 Nov 1998 01:53:12 +0100 (MET)</i>
<p>
<ul>
<li> <b>Messages sorted by:</b> <a href="date.html#174">[ date ]</a><a href="index.html#174">[ thread ]</a><a href="subject.html#174">[ subject ]</a><a href="author.html#174">[ author ]</a>
<!-- next="start" -->
<li> <b>Next message:</b> <a href="0175.html">Christian Grigis: "Re: Patch for Microtek ScanMaker X6 (microtek2 backend)"</a>
<li> <b>Previous message:</b> <a href="0173.html">Jonathan Buzzard: "Re: News from Minolta"</a>
<li> <b>In reply to:</b> <a href="0169.html">Michael K. Johnson: "Re: forwarded message from Richard Stallman"</a>
<!-- nextthread="start" -->
<li> <b>Next in thread:</b> <a href="0191.html">David Mosberger-Tang: "Re: forwarded message from Richard Stallman"</a>
<li> <b>Next in thread:</b> <a href="0189.html">David Mosberger-Tang: "Re: forwarded message from Richard Stallman"</a>
<li> <b>Next in thread:</b> <a href="0170.html">hank: "Re: forwarded message from Richard Stallman"</a>
<li> <b>Reply:</b> <a href="0191.html">David Mosberger-Tang: "Re: forwarded message from Richard Stallman"</a>
<!-- reply="end" -->
</ul>
<!-- body="start" -->
Hi !<br>
<p>
<i>&gt; &gt;Does anyone who contributed to SANE have reservations against SANE</i><br>
<i>&gt; &gt;becoming a GNU program? </i><br>
<p>
Yes I do. Due to similar reasoning like Michael.<br>
<p>
GNU licensing is a good thing. It keeps things free. But enforcing it<br>
is not good. We would be closing out some possible customers as well<br>
as programmers.<br>
<p>
As it is now, I do not see much of a problem in having SANE compatible<br>
non-free drivers or e.g. binary only drivers, that might be the only<br>
possibility to have drivers for some hardware at all.<br>
<p>
Yeah - binary drivers are bad, but better than nothing.<br>
<p>
As it is now, BSD people don't seem to have much of a problem with it,<br>
but I know for sure they do not like GPL. And I assume we cannot make<br>
SANE a GNU program without licensing it (L)GPL.<br>
<p>
BTW: I am not sure if the "exceptioned GPL" as used in the backends is<br>
legally valid, as GPL itself forbids modifications to it. Well - actually<br>
we are not using GPL (but our own license that refers to GPL), but that <br>
usage (referring to GPL from a modified license) might be completely invalid.<br>
Any lawyers here ?<br>
<p>
IMHO making the license LGPL should be safer ... for my own code, I give<br>
permission to change to any license that MIT/X style licensed (without the<br>
silly advertising clause) code could be sublicensed to. Including (L)GPL.<br>
<p>
At least our standards should be open and useable freely for anyone.<br>
<p>
<i>&gt; &gt;A GNU program should not recommend use of any non-free program, and it</i><br>
<i>&gt; &gt;should not refer the user to any non-free documentation.</i><br>
<i>&gt; I object. Trying to encourage freely-available documentation is one</i><br>
<i>&gt; thing, trying to refuse authors the right to refer folks to non-free</i><br>
<i>&gt; documentation when appropriate is objectionable.</i><br>
<p>
Yes. There are good books out there. And many of them are worth the price.<br>
Authors must live, too.<br>
<p>
<i>&gt; &gt;GNU programs to follow them. For example, the documentation files</i><br>
<i>&gt; &gt;and comments in the program should speak of Linux-based GNU systems or</i><br>
<i>&gt; &gt;GNU/Linux systems, rather than calling the whole system "Linux", and</i><br>
<i>&gt; &gt;should use the term "free software" rather than "open source".</i><br>
<p>
Hmmm - isn't that again overdoing it a little ?<br>
There is a small ledge between patriotism and fanatism ... walk carefully.<br>
<p>
CU,ANdy<br>
<p>
<pre>
--
= Andreas Beck | Email : &lt;<a href="mailto:andreas.beck@ggi-project.org">andreas.beck@ggi-project.org</a>&gt; =
<p>
<pre>
--
Source code, list archive, and docs: <a href="http://www.mostang.com/sane/">http://www.mostang.com/sane/</a>
To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail <a href="mailto:majordomo@mostang.com">majordomo@mostang.com</a>
</pre>
<!-- body="end" -->
<p>
<ul>
<!-- next="start" -->
<li> <b>Next message:</b> <a href="0175.html">Christian Grigis: "Re: Patch for Microtek ScanMaker X6 (microtek2 backend)"</a>
<li> <b>Previous message:</b> <a href="0173.html">Jonathan Buzzard: "Re: News from Minolta"</a>
<li> <b>In reply to:</b> <a href="0169.html">Michael K. Johnson: "Re: forwarded message from Richard Stallman"</a>
<!-- nextthread="start" -->
<li> <b>Next in thread:</b> <a href="0191.html">David Mosberger-Tang: "Re: forwarded message from Richard Stallman"</a>
<li> <b>Next in thread:</b> <a href="0189.html">David Mosberger-Tang: "Re: forwarded message from Richard Stallman"</a>
<li> <b>Next in thread:</b> <a href="0170.html">hank: "Re: forwarded message from Richard Stallman"</a>
<li> <b>Reply:</b> <a href="0191.html">David Mosberger-Tang: "Re: forwarded message from Richard Stallman"</a>
<!-- reply="end" -->
</ul>