sane-project-website/old-archive/1998-10/0054.html

59 wiersze
2.9 KiB
HTML

This file contains invisible Unicode characters!

This file contains invisible Unicode characters that may be processed differently from what appears below. If your use case is intentional and legitimate, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal hidden characters.

<!-- received="Sun Oct 4 06:30:46 1998 PDT" -->
<!-- sent="Sun, 04 Oct 1998 12:34:04 +0200 (CEST)" -->
<!-- name="Didier Carlier" -->
<!-- email="carlierd@acm.org" -->
<!-- subject="RE: Nikon or Minolta slide scanner?" -->
<!-- id="" -->
<!-- inreplyto="E0zO8OW-0003yH-00@post.mail.demon.net" -->
<title>sane-devel: RE: Nikon or Minolta slide scanner?</title>
<h1>RE: Nikon or Minolta slide scanner?</h1>
<b>Didier Carlier</b> (<a href="mailto:carlierd@acm.org"><i>carlierd@acm.org</i></a>)<br>
<i>Sun, 04 Oct 1998 12:34:04 +0200 (CEST)</i>
<p>
<ul>
<li> <b>Messages sorted by:</b> <a href="date.html#54">[ date ]</a><a href="index.html#54">[ thread ]</a><a href="subject.html#54">[ subject ]</a><a href="author.html#54">[ author ]</a>
<!-- next="start" -->
<li> <b>Next message:</b> <a href="0055.html">Craig Ruff: "Re: HP photosmart and negatives to positives"</a>
<li> <b>Previous message:</b> <a href="0053.html">Mitch Chapman: "Mustek 1200 III SP and color registration"</a>
<li> <b>In reply to:</b> <a href="0042.html">David Bartlett: "Nikon or Minolta slide scanner?"</a>
<!-- nextthread="start" -->
<li> <b>Next in thread:</b> <a href="0057.html">Mathias Koerber: "Re: Nikon or Minolta slide scanner?"</a>
<!-- reply="end" -->
</ul>
<!-- body="start" -->
On 29-Sep-98 David Bartlett wrote:<br>
<i>&gt; I'd like to get either the Nikon CoolScan III, or a Minolta Dimage Scan Dual</i><br>
<i>&gt; slide/film scanner. Neither appears to be supported by sane at present.</i><br>
<i>&gt; </i><br>
<i>&gt; 1. Is anyone working on drivers for either scanner?</i><br>
<i>&gt; </i><br>
<i>&gt; 2. If not, I'd consider taking on writing them, but would I be more likely to</i><br>
<i>&gt; get the necessary device information from Nikon or Minolta? Advice as to the</i><br>
<i>&gt; best way to go about getting the requisite information would also be welcome.</i><br>
<p>
I've asked for the Nikon Coolscan III specs in the hope that they weren't too<br>
different from the Coolscan II ones, but didn't receive any reply...<br>
<p>
I've heard that they are planning to release the specifications by the end of<br>
the year though.<br>
<p>
Good luck,<br>
Didier<br>
<p>
<pre>
--
Source code, list archive, and docs: <a href="http://www.mostang.com/sane/">http://www.mostang.com/sane/</a>
To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail <a href="mailto:majordomo@mostang.com">majordomo@mostang.com</a>
</pre>
<!-- body="end" -->
<p>
<ul>
<!-- next="start" -->
<li> <b>Next message:</b> <a href="0055.html">Craig Ruff: "Re: HP photosmart and negatives to positives"</a>
<li> <b>Previous message:</b> <a href="0053.html">Mitch Chapman: "Mustek 1200 III SP and color registration"</a>
<li> <b>In reply to:</b> <a href="0042.html">David Bartlett: "Nikon or Minolta slide scanner?"</a>
<!-- nextthread="start" -->
<li> <b>Next in thread:</b> <a href="0057.html">Mathias Koerber: "Re: Nikon or Minolta slide scanner?"</a>
<!-- reply="end" -->
</ul>