sane-project-website/old-archive/1998-09/0152.html

203 wiersze
8.0 KiB
HTML

This file contains invisible Unicode characters!

This file contains invisible Unicode characters that may be processed differently from what appears below. If your use case is intentional and legitimate, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal hidden characters.

<!-- received="Tue Sep 22 07:17:26 1998 PDT" -->
<!-- sent="Tue, 22 Sep 1998 09:16:34 -0500 (EST)" -->
<!-- name="Brian E. Bothwell" -->
<!-- email="brbothwe@cs.indiana.edu" -->
<!-- subject="Microtek ScanMaker X6EL supported??" -->
<!-- id="" -->
<!-- inreplyto="" -->
<title>sane-devel: Microtek ScanMaker X6EL supported??</title>
<h1>Microtek ScanMaker X6EL supported??</h1>
<b>Brian E. Bothwell</b> (<a href="mailto:brbothwe@cs.indiana.edu"><i>brbothwe@cs.indiana.edu</i></a>)<br>
<i>Tue, 22 Sep 1998 09:16:34 -0500 (EST)</i>
<p>
<ul>
<li> <b>Messages sorted by:</b> <a href="date.html#152">[ date ]</a><a href="index.html#152">[ thread ]</a><a href="subject.html#152">[ subject ]</a><a href="author.html#152">[ author ]</a>
<!-- next="start" -->
<li> <b>Next message:</b> <a href="0153.html">Brian E. Bothwell: "Re: Microtek ScanMaker X6EL supported??"</a>
<li> <b>Previous message:</b> <a href="0151.html">Bernd Schroeder: "Re: Microtek ScanMaker V300?"</a>
<!-- nextthread="start" -->
<!-- reply="end" -->
</ul>
<!-- body="start" -->
I just got a Microtek ScanMaker X6EL (hanging off of a Adaptec AVA-2902<br>
adapter, which shows up successfully as a Adaptec AIC-7850 and works with<br>
the Zip drive on the same SCSI chain)<br>
<p>
I set up SANE to use only the microtek and microtek2 backends, while the<br>
scanner seems to be recognized, SANE still complains "no SANE devices<br>
found".<br>
<p>
Anyone had any luck with this model? It's a great scanner, and I would<br>
love not to have to boot to Windoze95 to use it. I assume if their is no<br>
support, this is due to the fact the X6EL is so new to the market.<br>
<p>
*************************************************<br>
<p>
Here is a debugging dump of the microtek and microtek2 backends<br>
(one thing to note is the VENDOR string is ' ', and the model it<br>
shows up as is '636EL')<br>
----------------------------------------------------------------<br>
[root@scruffy sane.d]# scanimage<br>
[inquiry]<br>
120000006000<br>
[inquiryresult]<br>
060002025b00000020202020202020207363616e6e657220363336454c202020312e3130980000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000<br>
[inquiry]<br>
120000006000<br>
[inquiryresult]<br>
060002025b00000020202020202020207363616e6e657220363336454c202020312e3130980000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000<br>
[inquiry]<br>
120000006000<br>
[inquiryresult]<br>
060002025b00000020202020202020207363616e6e657220363336454c202020312e3130980000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000<br>
[inquiry]<br>
120000006000<br>
[inquiryresult]<br>
060002025b00000020202020202020207363616e6e657220363336454c202020312e3130980000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000<br>
[sanei_init_debug]: Setting debug level of microtek to 128.<br>
[microtek] sane_init: MICROTEK says hello! (v0.9)<br>
[microtek] sane_init: config- #Uncomment following line to disable<br>
"clever precalibration" routines...<br>
[microtek] sane_init: config- #noprecal<br>
[microtek] sane_init: config- #scsi VENDOR MODEL TYPE BUS CHANNEL ID LUN<br>
[microtek] sane_init: config- #scsi * * Scanner 0 0 6 0<br>
[microtek] sane_init: config- scsi * * Scanner<br>
[microtek] attach_scanner: /dev/sgd<br>
[microtek] attach_scanner: opening /dev/sgd<br>
[microtek] attach_scanner: sending INQUIRY<br>
[microtek] id_microtek...<br>
[microtek] id_microtek: (uses new SCSI II command set)<br>
<p>
<p>
<p>
========== Congratulations! ==========<br>
You appear to be the proud owner of a <br>
brand-new Microtek scanner, which uses<br>
a new SCSI II command set. <br>
<p>
Try the `microtek2' backend instead. <br>
<p>
<p>
<p>
[microtek] attach_scanner: device doesn't look like a Microtek<br>
scanner.[microtek] dump_suspect_inquiry...<br>
=== SANE/Microtek backend v0.9 ===<br>
========== Scanner Inquiry Block ========mm<br>
06 00 02 02 5b 00 00 00 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 <br>
73 63 61 6e 6e 65 72 20 36 33 36 45 4c 20 20 20 <br>
31 2e 31 30 98 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 <br>
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 <br>
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 <br>
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 <br>
<p>
========== Scanner Inquiry Report ==========<br>
===== Scanner ID...<br>
Device Type Code: 0x06<br>
Model Code: 0x00<br>
Vendor Name: ' ' Model Name: 'scanner 636EL '<br>
Firmware Rev: '1.10'<br>
SCSI F/W version: 0.0 Scanner F/W version: 0.2<br>
Response data format: 0x02<br>
<p>
<p>
[microtek] attach_scanner: /dev/sgd<br>
[microtek] attach_scanner: opening /dev/sgd<br>
[microtek] attach_scanner: sending INQUIRY<br>
[microtek] id_microtek...<br>
[microtek] id_microtek: (uses new SCSI II command set)<br>
<p>
<p>
<p>
========== Congratulations! ==========<br>
You appear to be the proud owner of a <br>
brand-new Microtek scanner, which uses<br>
a new SCSI II command set. <br>
<p>
Try the `microtek2' backend instead. <br>
<p>
<p>
<p>
[microtek] attach_scanner: device doesn't look like a Microtek<br>
scanner.[microtek] dump_suspect_inquiry...<br>
=== SANE/Microtek backend v0.9 ===<br>
========== Scanner Inquiry Block ========mm<br>
06 00 02 02 5b 00 00 00 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 <br>
73 63 61 6e 6e 65 72 20 36 33 36 45 4c 20 20 20 <br>
31 2e 31 30 98 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 <br>
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 <br>
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 <br>
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 <br>
<p>
========== Scanner Inquiry Report ==========<br>
===== Scanner ID...<br>
Device Type Code: 0x06<br>
Model Code: 0x00<br>
Vendor Name: ' ' Model Name: 'scanner 636EL '<br>
Firmware Rev: '1.10'<br>
SCSI F/W version: 0.0 Scanner F/W version: 0.2<br>
Response data format: 0x02<br>
<p>
<p>
[microtek] sane_init: config- /dev/scanner<br>
[microtek] attach_scanner: /dev/scanner<br>
[microtek] attach_scanner: opening /dev/scanner<br>
[microtek] attach_scanner: sending INQUIRY<br>
[microtek] id_microtek...<br>
[microtek] id_microtek: (uses new SCSI II command set)<br>
<p>
<p>
<p>
========== Congratulations! ==========<br>
You appear to be the proud owner of a <br>
brand-new Microtek scanner, which uses<br>
a new SCSI II command set. <br>
<p>
Try the `microtek2' backend instead. <br>
<p>
<p>
<p>
[microtek] attach_scanner: device doesn't look like a Microtek<br>
scanner.[microtek] dump_suspect_inquiry...<br>
=== SANE/Microtek backend v0.9 ===<br>
========== Scanner Inquiry Block ========mm<br>
06 00 02 02 5b 00 00 00 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 <br>
73 63 61 6e 6e 65 72 20 36 33 36 45 4c 20 20 20 <br>
31 2e 31 30 98 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 <br>
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 <br>
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 <br>
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 <br>
<p>
========== Scanner Inquiry Report ==========<br>
===== Scanner ID...<br>
Device Type Code: 0x06<br>
Model Code: 0x00<br>
Vendor Name: ' ' Model Name: 'scanner 636EL '<br>
Firmware Rev: '1.10'<br>
SCSI F/W version: 0.0 Scanner F/W version: 0.2<br>
Response data format: 0x02<br>
<p>
<p>
[microtek] sane_get_devices<br>
scanimage: no SANE devices found<br>
[microtek] sane_exit...<br>
[microtek] sane_exit: MICROTEK says goodbye.<br>
<br>
<p>
**********************************************<br>
<p>
<p>
<pre>
--
Source code, list archive, and docs: <a href="http://www.mostang.com/sane/">http://www.mostang.com/sane/</a>
To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail <a href="mailto:majordomo@mostang.com">majordomo@mostang.com</a>
</pre>
<!-- body="end" -->
<p>
<ul>
<!-- next="start" -->
<li> <b>Next message:</b> <a href="0153.html">Brian E. Bothwell: "Re: Microtek ScanMaker X6EL supported??"</a>
<li> <b>Previous message:</b> <a href="0151.html">Bernd Schroeder: "Re: Microtek ScanMaker V300?"</a>
<!-- nextthread="start" -->
<!-- reply="end" -->
</ul>