sane-project-website/old-archive/1998-06/0062.html

130 wiersze
6.8 KiB
HTML

This file contains invisible Unicode characters!

This file contains invisible Unicode characters that may be processed differently from what appears below. If your use case is intentional and legitimate, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal hidden characters.

<!-- received="Sun Jun 7 10:42:39 1998 PDT" -->
<!-- sent="Sun, 7 Jun 1998 19:39:58 +0200 (CEST)" -->
<!-- name="Hugo van der Kooij" -->
<!-- email="hvdkooij@caiw.nl" -->
<!-- subject="Re: Scanace NDA for your perusal." -->
<!-- id="" -->
<!-- inreplyto="199806071513.RAA02954@cave.BitWizard.nl" -->
<title>sane-devel: Re: Scanace NDA for your perusal.</title>
<h1>Re: Scanace NDA for your perusal.</h1>
<b>Hugo van der Kooij</b> (<a href="mailto:hvdkooij@caiw.nl"><i>hvdkooij@caiw.nl</i></a>)<br>
<i>Sun, 7 Jun 1998 19:39:58 +0200 (CEST)</i>
<p>
<ul>
<li> <b>Messages sorted by:</b> <a href="date.html#62">[ date ]</a><a href="index.html#62">[ thread ]</a><a href="subject.html#62">[ subject ]</a><a href="author.html#62">[ author ]</a>
<!-- next="start" -->
<li> <b>Next message:</b> <a href="0063.html">Oliver.Rauch@Wolfsburg.DE: "Re: Problems with CANCEL"</a>
<li> <b>Previous message:</b> <a href="0061.html">Hugo van der Kooij: "Re: Highscreen HighScan and microtek2-backend"</a>
<li> <b>In reply to:</b> <a href="0057.html">Rogier Wolff: "Re: Scanace NDA for your perusal."</a>
<!-- nextthread="start" -->
<!-- reply="end" -->
</ul>
<!-- body="start" -->
On Sun, 7 Jun 1998, Rogier Wolff wrote:<br>
<p>
<i>&gt; Hugo van der Kooij wrote:</i><br>
<i>&gt; &gt; </i><br>
<i>&gt; &gt; On Sat, 6 Jun 1998, Dave Restall - System Administrator wrote:</i><br>
<i>&gt; &gt; </i><br>
<i>&gt; &gt; &gt; Hi,</i><br>
<i>&gt; &gt; &gt; </i><br>
<i>&gt; &gt; &gt; Attached is the NDA in PDF format. Apart from it having a few minor</i><br>
<i>&gt; &gt; &gt; problems in the translation to English, it seems ok. I have a few</i><br>
<i>&gt; &gt; &gt; reservations about one of the phrases :-</i><br>
<i>&gt; &gt; &gt; </i><br>
<i>&gt; &gt; &gt; Paragraph 2 : "...Confidant will not create new or derivative works, or</i><br>
<i>&gt; &gt; &gt; manufacture on the basis of the PIE information"</i><br>
<i>&gt; &gt; &gt; </i><br>
<i>&gt; &gt; &gt; Isn't the driver a "derivative work" ?</i><br>
<i>&gt; &gt; </i><br>
<i>&gt; &gt; YES. In the sense that you 'manufacture' a driver based on the PIE</i><br>
<i>&gt; &gt; information. The best source for this is still their legal department.</i><br>
<i>&gt; </i><br>
<i>&gt; </i><br>
<i>&gt; Hugo, (and Dave) read the NDA. This clause is meant to prevent the</i><br>
<i>&gt; information from spreading:</i><br>
<i>&gt; </i><br>
<i>&gt; You claim to need the information for THIS, and then start also using</i><br>
<i>&gt; it for THAT. </i><br>
<p>
Now you lost me. I mentioned two different things in two sentences. And<br>
you make it sound like I was making one single statement.<br>
<p>
Furthermore I stated in a previous message that it was my impression their<br>
prime objective was to keep their engineering secrets away from the<br>
compitition. But as Dave still seemed not sure about this I advised thim<br>
to put the questions to PIE and let them simplify things for him.<br>
<p>
<i>&gt; In this case "THIS" is defined as "writing and maintaining a SANE</i><br>
<i>&gt; driver for the PIE scanner". (The stuff in the NDA is slightly</i><br>
<i>&gt; convoluted. I suggest you (Dave) propose this as a replacement) "THAT"</i><br>
<i>&gt; could be something like developing an NT driver for the things. Or</i><br>
<i>&gt; writing a driver for a competing MS product, when they have promised</i><br>
<i>&gt; MS not to allow that to happen. </i><br>
<i>&gt; </i><br>
<i>&gt; Dave, it is perfectly normal that you have a few iterations about a</i><br>
<i>&gt; "contract" before both parties like it. By the time they are editing</i><br>
<i>&gt; contracts, they are sufficiently interested that they won't back out</i><br>
<i>&gt; on a "hey, if I read this carefully, it prevents me from doing what we</i><br>
<i>&gt; agreed on I'd be doing". </i><br>
<i>&gt; </i><br>
<i>&gt; &gt; Make a small list of questions they only have to answer with Yes or No and</i><br>
<i>&gt; &gt; let them sort it out.</i><br>
<i>&gt; &gt; </i><br>
<i>&gt; &gt; The questions that pop up are:</i><br>
<i>&gt; &gt; </i><br>
<i>&gt; &gt; 1. May a driver be developed based on this information?</i><br>
<i>&gt; </i><br>
<i>&gt; Yes. The paragraph before article one says so. </i><br>
<i>&gt; </i><br>
<i>&gt; &gt; 2. May a third party use this driver without the author of the driver</i><br>
<i>&gt; &gt; informing PIE or have that third party sign a similar NDA agreement?</i><br>
<i>&gt; </i><br>
<i>&gt; Yes. The information that PIE gives Dave is restricted. The NDA says</i><br>
<i>&gt; that the purpose of PIE giving information to dave is specifically to</i><br>
<i>&gt; develop the SANE driver. </i><br>
<i>&gt; </i><br>
<i>&gt; &gt; 3. May a third party have access to source code of this driver without</i><br>
<i>&gt; &gt; the author of that driver informing PIE or have that third party sign a</i><br>
<i>&gt; &gt; similar NDA agreement?</i><br>
<i>&gt; </i><br>
<i>&gt; I think Dave has talked this over with PIE. If I'd suspect that they</i><br>
<i>&gt; are stupid and TELL me that they really know what GPL means, but in</i><br>
<i>&gt; fact would be surprised if I released source code, I'd just silently</i><br>
<i>&gt; go ahead, and wait for "trouble". In the current world, you cannot</i><br>
<i>&gt; claim that you don't know what GPL is. In case that you've been</i><br>
<i>&gt; confronted with it you should've found out what it means and that's</i><br>
<i>&gt; "readily available".</i><br>
<p>
Yes you can. I find plenty of people around that have never heard of the<br>
GPL nor it's implications. I think you take something for granted here<br>
which you should NOT take for granted.<br>
<p>
hugo.<br>
<p>
+------------------------+------------------------------+<br>
<i> | Hugo van der Kooij | <a href="mailto:Hugo.van.der.Kooij@caiw.nl">Hugo.van.der.Kooij@caiw.nl</a> |</i><br>
<i> | Oranje Nassaustraat 16 | <a href="http://www.caiw.nl/~hvdkooij">http://www.caiw.nl/~hvdkooij</a> |</i><br>
<i> | 3155 VJ Maasland | (De man met de rode hoed) |</i><br>
+------------------------+------------------------------+<br>
"Computers let you make more mistakes faster than any other invention in <br>
human history, with the possible exception of handguns and tequila."<br>
(Mitch Radcliffe)<br>
<p>
<p>
<pre>
--
Source code, list archive, and docs: <a href="http://www.mostang.com/sane/">http://www.mostang.com/sane/</a>
To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail <a href="mailto:majordomo@mostang.com">majordomo@mostang.com</a>
</pre>
<!-- body="end" -->
<p>
<ul>
<!-- next="start" -->
<li> <b>Next message:</b> <a href="0063.html">Oliver.Rauch@Wolfsburg.DE: "Re: Problems with CANCEL"</a>
<li> <b>Previous message:</b> <a href="0061.html">Hugo van der Kooij: "Re: Highscreen HighScan and microtek2-backend"</a>
<li> <b>In reply to:</b> <a href="0057.html">Rogier Wolff: "Re: Scanace NDA for your perusal."</a>
<!-- nextthread="start" -->
<!-- reply="end" -->
</ul>