sane-project-website/old-archive/1998-04/0291.html

69 wiersze
3.3 KiB
HTML

<!-- received="Mon Apr 27 10:18:36 1998 PDT" -->
<!-- sent="Mon, 27 Apr 1998 19:13:51 +0200 (MEST)" -->
<!-- name="hopp@darkstar.fact.rhein-ruhr.de" -->
<!-- email="hopp@darkstar.fact.rhein-ruhr.de" -->
<!-- subject="Re[2]: Re[2]: gtk_tooltips" -->
<!-- id="m0yTrTT-000FgkC@darkstar" -->
<!-- inreplyto="Pine.LNX.3.96.980427075031.17435A-100000@hvdkooij" -->
<title>sane-devel: Re[2]: Re[2]: gtk_tooltips</title>
<h1>Re[2]: Re[2]: gtk_tooltips</h1>
<a href="mailto:hopp@darkstar.fact.rhein-ruhr.de"><i>hopp@darkstar.fact.rhein-ruhr.de</i></a><br>
<i>Mon, 27 Apr 1998 19:13:51 +0200 (MEST)</i>
<p>
<ul>
<li> <b>Messages sorted by:</b> <a href="date.html#291">[ date ]</a><a href="index.html#291">[ thread ]</a><a href="subject.html#291">[ subject ]</a><a href="author.html#291">[ author ]</a>
<!-- next="start" -->
<li> <b>Next message:</b> <a href="0292.html">Kenneth Crudup: "Re: Success compiling sane-0.72, gtk-1.0 and gimp-0.99.28"</a>
<li> <b>Previous message:</b> <a href="0290.html">Christoph Doerbeck: "Success compiling sane-0.72, gtk-1.0 and gimp-0.99.28"</a>
<!-- nextthread="start" -->
<!-- reply="end" -->
</ul>
<!-- body="start" -->
<i>&gt; On Sun, 26 Apr 1998, David Mosberger-Tang wrote:</i><br>
<i>&gt; </i><br>
<i>&gt; </i><br>
<i>&gt; &gt; Hugo&gt; Please report this as a SERIOUS bug. Using wrong version</i><br>
<i>&gt; &gt; Hugo&gt; numbers for RPM packages is a serious matter and should be</i><br>
<i>&gt; &gt; Hugo&gt; solved immediately!</i><br>
<i>&gt; &gt; </i><br>
<i>&gt; &gt; Note that this is not SuSE's fault. All versions in the gtk+ 0.99</i><br>
<i>&gt; &gt; series used a shared library version of 1.0.</i><br>
<i>&gt; </i><br>
<i>&gt; I was thinking of the RPM version numbers. I wonder if those are set</i><br>
<i>&gt; correctly. If they are, then the user should have checked if gtk and gimp</i><br>
<i>&gt; were installed as package and which version they are.</i><br>
<i>&gt; </i><br>
<i>&gt; rpm -qa|grep gtk</i><br>
<i>&gt; rpm -qa|grep gimp</i><br>
rpm -qi gtk : 0.99.3<br>
rpm -qi gimp : 0.99.18-4<br>
<i>&gt; </i><br>
<i>&gt; If they are not identical to the actual version installed then SuSe has a</i><br>
<i>&gt; serious problem. Otherwise the user should have paid a little more</i><br>
<i>&gt; attention (as should I).</i><br>
i don't know who's fault it is, but configure (sane-0.72) shows<br>
checking for gtk_tooltips_set_tooltips ... cached (no) <br>
when ever i install the SuSE gtk package. (version 0.99.3)<br>
(before installation of the SuSE package I checked, that /usr/include/gtk is removed and that no /usr/local/include/gtk exists)<br>
<p>
But i think this error is not worth a deeper investigation, because the error will vanish as soon as the SuSE-package is upgraded<br>
<p>
mfg<br>
Uli<br>
<p>
<p>
<pre>
--
Source code, list archive, and docs: <a href="http://www.mostang.com/sane/">http://www.mostang.com/sane/</a>
To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail <a href="mailto:majordomo@mostang.com">majordomo@mostang.com</a>
</pre>
<!-- body="end" -->
<p>
<ul>
<!-- next="start" -->
<li> <b>Next message:</b> <a href="0292.html">Kenneth Crudup: "Re: Success compiling sane-0.72, gtk-1.0 and gimp-0.99.28"</a>
<li> <b>Previous message:</b> <a href="0290.html">Christoph Doerbeck: "Success compiling sane-0.72, gtk-1.0 and gimp-0.99.28"</a>
<!-- nextthread="start" -->
<!-- reply="end" -->
</ul>