sane-project-website/old-archive/1998-03/0066.html

81 wiersze
3.7 KiB
HTML

<!-- received="Tue Mar 10 02:14:32 1998 PST" -->
<!-- sent="Tue, 10 Mar 1998 11:04:24 +0100 (MET)" -->
<!-- name="Rogier Wolff" -->
<!-- email="R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl" -->
<!-- subject="Re: Microtek ScanMaker 330" -->
<!-- id="199803101004.LAA01169@cave.BitWizard.nl" -->
<!-- inreplyto="199803100608.BAA18481@yoo-hoo.ai.mit.edu" -->
<title>sane-devel: Re: Microtek ScanMaker 330</title>
<h1>Re: Microtek ScanMaker 330</h1>
<b>Rogier Wolff</b> (<a href="mailto:R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl"><i>R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl</i></a>)<br>
<i>Tue, 10 Mar 1998 11:04:24 +0100 (MET)</i>
<p>
<ul>
<li> <b>Messages sorted by:</b> <a href="date.html#66">[ date ]</a><a href="index.html#66">[ thread ]</a><a href="subject.html#66">[ subject ]</a><a href="author.html#66">[ author ]</a>
<!-- next="start" -->
<li> <b>Next message:</b> <a href="0067.html">Rogier Wolff: "Re: Microtek woes"</a>
<li> <b>Previous message:</b> <a href="0065.html">Helmut Koeberle: "Re: Sane 0.71 and CanoScan 300"</a>
<li> <b>In reply to:</b> <a href="0063.html">Matto Marjanovic: "Re: Microtek ScanMaker 330"</a>
<!-- nextthread="start" -->
<!-- reply="end" -->
</ul>
<!-- body="start" -->
Matto Marjanovic wrote:<br>
<p>
<i>&gt; It seems to follow some kind of SCSI-II standard. I don't know how</i><br>
<i>&gt; similar it is to the command sets of other brands of new scanners,</i><br>
<i>&gt; but perhaps one generic SCSI-II scanner backend will be possible.</i><br>
<i>&gt; We can dream, no?</i><br>
<p>
The SCSI-II standard about scanners is sufficiently vague that you<br>
cannot build a scanner solely on the specs. <br>
<p>
I mean that a disk drive implements a well-defined "read" and "write",<br>
and that's sufficient for a functional disk drive. The amount of<br>
commands that a scanner needs to support to be able to function is<br>
much larger, but the specs leave enough "vague" that a manufacturer<br>
almost always needs to do essential stuff in "vendor extentions".<br>
<p>
Tamarack sent me their interpretation of the SCSI-II specs. I was able<br>
to build the Tamarack backend on that. Getting access to the SCSI-II<br>
specs and noting the similarity, I wasn't able to get the coolscan to<br>
work with the tamarack driver. (I didn't put in very much time though).<br>
<p>
A general SCSI-II standard driver would need:<br>
<p>
- A "standard" way to approach a scanner, adhering to SCSI-II/scanner<br>
as close as possible.<br>
<p>
- A config file that specifies at what points this scanner is<br>
"different"from the standard: Specifying extra required commands at<br>
certain points, and ways to extract information like "bytes per<br>
line" from the replies.<br>
<p>
It is not a trivial task to create such a backend. <br>
<p>
Roger. <br>
<p>
<p>
<pre>
--
If it's there and you can see it, it's REAL <a href="mailto:|___R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl">|___R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl</a> |
If it's there and you can't see it, it's TRANSPARENT | Tel: +31-15-2137555 |
If it's not there and you can see it, it's VIRTUAL |__FAX:_+31-15-2138217 |
If it's not there and you can't see it, it's GONE! -- Roy Wilks, 1983 |_____|
<p>
<pre>
--
Source code, list archive, and docs: <a href="http://www.mostang.com/sane/">http://www.mostang.com/sane/</a>
To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail <a href="mailto:majordomo@mostang.com">majordomo@mostang.com</a>
</pre>
<!-- body="end" -->
<p>
<ul>
<!-- next="start" -->
<li> <b>Next message:</b> <a href="0067.html">Rogier Wolff: "Re: Microtek woes"</a>
<li> <b>Previous message:</b> <a href="0065.html">Helmut Koeberle: "Re: Sane 0.71 and CanoScan 300"</a>
<li> <b>In reply to:</b> <a href="0063.html">Matto Marjanovic: "Re: Microtek ScanMaker 330"</a>
<!-- nextthread="start" -->
<!-- reply="end" -->
</ul>