# Re: /proc/scsi/scsi

David Mosberger-Tang (David.Mosberger@acm.org)
Mon, 20 Apr 1998 21:21:00 -0700

- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
- Next message: Kaz Sasayama: "configure --disable-static?"
- Previous message: David Mosberger-Tang: "Re: Just wanted to extend my congratulations"
- In reply to: Oliver.Rauch@Wolfsburg.DE: "Re: /proc/scsi/scsi"
- Next in thread: Oliver.Rauch@Wolfsburg.DE: "Re: /proc/scsi/scsi"
- Reply: Oliver.Rauch@Wolfsburg.DE: "Re: /proc/scsi/scsi"

>>>>> On Mon, 20 Apr 1998 23:15:17 +0200 (MET DST), Oliver.Rauch@Wolfsburg.DE said:

Oliver> I don't think that someone uses two scanners of the same
Oliver> type at the same scsi-id!

I don't think that's a very good assumption. IMHO, if we do want to
go towards autoconfiguration, we should go all the way. That is, we
should try to get rid of the configuration file completely. Anything
else will only increase user confusion.

--david

    --
    Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/
    To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com

- Next message: Kaz Sasayama: "configure --disable-static?"
- Previous message: David Mosberger-Tang: "Re: Just wanted to extend my congratulations"
- In reply to: Oliver.Rauch@Wolfsburg.DE: "Re: /proc/scsi/scsi"
- Next in thread: Oliver.Rauch@Wolfsburg.DE: "Re: /proc/scsi/scsi"
- Reply: Oliver.Rauch@Wolfsburg.DE: "Re: /proc/scsi/scsi"