# Re: Test for S20 support

From: Peter Daum (gator@cs.tu-berlin.de)
Date: Sun May 21 2000 - 05:06:34 PDT

- Next message: pixel fairy: "Re: "Standard" or "best" image format?"
  - Previous message: Oliver Neukum: "call for testers of usb device driver"
  - In reply to: Peter Daum: "Re: Test for S20 support"
  - Next in thread: Peter Kirchgessner: "Re: Test for S20 support"
  - Next in thread: John Fremlin: "Re: Test for S20 support"
  - Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

  On Sat, 20 May 2000, Peter Daum wrote:

  ...
  > I have a S20, but no other USB scanner - I can't tell whether I
  > set things up correctly. Here's what I did:
  ...

  What I probably should have mentioned, too:
  this is referring to sane 1.0.2
  I am normally using kernel version 2.2.15 with the
  "usb-2.3.47-for-2.2.14" backport. (running Linux 2.3.99-pre8
  and/or the "alternate" uhci driver doesn't make any major
  difference - in any case I just get a timeout).

  Regards,
  Peter

      --
                                                   __o
           Peter Daum <gator at cs.tu-berlin.de> _'\<_
             - pgp messages welcome -       ____(_)/(_)
      --
      Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/
      To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com

  - Next message: pixel fairy: "Re: "Standard" or "best" image format?"
  - Previous message: Oliver Neukum: "call for testers of usb device driver"
  - In reply to: Peter Daum: "Re: Test for S20 support"
  - Next in thread: Peter Kirchgessner: "Re: Test for S20 support"
  - Next in thread: John Fremlin: "Re: Test for S20 support"
  - Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

  This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun May 21 2000 - 05:32:18 PDT