# Re: sane fronten packages

From: Oliver Rauch (oliver.rauch@Wolfsburg.DE)
Date: Fri Oct 20 2000 - 07:33:06 PDT

- Next message: abel deuring: "Re: Problems with Acer ScanPrisa 640S"
  - Previous message: Oliver Rauch: "Re: make dll.c robust against it being listed in its configuration file..."
  - In reply to: Petter Reinholdtsen: "Re: sane fronten packages"
  - Next in thread: Petter Reinholdtsen: "Re: sane fronten packages"
  - Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

  Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:

  > I suggest splitting SANE in two:
  >
  > - all backends, documentation, scanimage and the Java library
  > - all X frontends and scanadf.

  Hi Petter,

  what about "japi"?
  Does it work?
  If yes: then we should add a good instruction how to install it,
  create Makefiles for it etc. But I don`t think it should be kept
  in the sane backend package.
  If no: we should remove it. It looks like there is no one
  working on it since 2 or 3 years.

  I see no problem to make a xscanimage+xcam package.
  Is scanadf an X based frontend or a command line frontend?

  Bye
  Oliver

      --
      Homepage:	http://www.wolfsburg.de/~rauch
      sane-umax:	http://www.wolfsburg.de/~rauch/sane/sane-umax.html
      xsane:		http://www.wolfsburg.de/~rauch/sane/sane-xsane.html
      E-Mail:		mailto:Oliver.Rauch@Wolfsburg.DE
      --
      Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/
      To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com

  - Next message: abel deuring: "Re: Problems with Acer ScanPrisa 640S"
  - Previous message: Oliver Rauch: "Re: make dll.c robust against it being listed in its configuration file..."
  - In reply to: Petter Reinholdtsen: "Re: sane fronten packages"
  - Next in thread: Petter Reinholdtsen: "Re: sane fronten packages"
  - Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

  This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Oct 20 2000 - 07:18:59 PDT