# Re: SANE frames

David Mosberger-Tang (David.Mosberger@acm.org)
Fri, 20 Aug 1999 07:42:44 -0700

- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
- Next message: Stephen Williams: "Re: SANE frames"
- Previous message: Oliver Rauch: "Re: SANE frames"
- Next in thread: Nick Lamb: "Re: SANE frames"
- Reply: Nick Lamb: "Re: SANE frames"

>>>>> On Fri, 20 Aug 1999 15:48:49 +0200, Oliver Rauch <oliver.rauch@Wolfsburg.DE> said:

Oliver> Another thing is that some scanners are able to do a "batch
Oliver> scan", that means the scanner does scan multiple images
Oliver> while the scanhead moves over the page, so the scanhead is
Oliver> not moved into start position every time. But this can not
Oliver> be used with the current sane standard.

I disagree. sane_start() is a signal that the frontend is ready to
read the next image. It does _not_ necessarily mean that the scanhead
should go back to its start position.

--david

    --
    Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/
    To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com

- Next message: Stephen Williams: "Re: SANE frames"
- Previous message: Oliver Rauch: "Re: SANE frames"
- Next in thread: Nick Lamb: "Re: SANE frames"
- Reply: Nick Lamb: "Re: SANE frames"