# Re: Xsane: Slider scan resolution selection

From: Oliver Rauch (oliver.rauch@Wolfsburg.DE)
Date: Mon Jan 31 2000 - 09:48:58 PST

- Next message: Oliver Rauch: "Re: xsane: no devices available"
  - Previous message: Oliver Rauch: "Re: Xsane: Slider scan resolution selection"
  - In reply to: Ben Laurie: "Re: Xsane: Slider scan resolution selection"
  - Next in thread: genkin@canada.com: "Re: Xsane: Slider scan resolution selection"
  - Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

  Ben Laurie wrote:

  > Hmmm ... when I was playing with xscanimage, I found that although the
  > backend set the resolution to be (in my case) 200-400 dpi in steps of
  > 100, the slider would freely choose any resolution. This is a bug,
  > surely?

  Yes and no.

  gtk does only support a value for "step" and for "page step" but it does
  not force the value to be quantisized that way.

  xsane does it like requested.

  Bye
  Oliver

      --
      Homepage:       http://www.wolfsburg.de/~rauch
      sane-umax:      http://www.wolfsburg.de/~rauch/sane/sane-umax.html
      xsane:          http://www.wolfsburg.de/~rauch/sane/sane-xsane.html
      E-Mail:         mailto:Oliver.Rauch@Wolfsburg.DE
      --
      Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/
      To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com

  - Next message: Oliver Rauch: "Re: xsane: no devices available"
  - Previous message: Oliver Rauch: "Re: Xsane: Slider scan resolution selection"
  - In reply to: Ben Laurie: "Re: Xsane: Slider scan resolution selection"
  - Next in thread: genkin@canada.com: "Re: Xsane: Slider scan resolution selection"
  - Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

  This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 31 2000 - 09:49:12 PST