# reaction to a smaller buffer size

From: Oliver Neukum (Oliver.Neukum@lrz.uni-muenchen.de)
Date: Sat Nov 18 2000 - 13:11:21 PST

- Next message: Jochen Eisinger: "Re: Patches for saned/net/scanimage/user-authorization...."
  - Previous message: Henning Meier-Geinitz: "Re: Patches for saned/net/scanimage/user-authorization...."
  - Next in thread: Henning Meier-Geinitz: "Re: reaction to a smaller buffer size"
  - Reply: Henning Meier-Geinitz: "Re: reaction to a smaller buffer size"
  - Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

  Hi,

  I'd like to ask whether that check

  if (real_buffersize != wanted_buffersize)
  {
  DBG(1, "sanei_scsi_open: could not allocate SG buffer memory "
  "wanted: %i got: %i\n", wanted_buffersize, real_buffersize);
  sanei_scsi_close(*fdp);
  return SANE_STATUS_NO_MEM;
  }

  in sanei_scsi.c might be removed. It makes using SANE with scsi drivers
  which don't do scatter/gather very hard.

  Regards
  Oliver Neukum

      --
      Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/
      To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com

  - Next message: Jochen Eisinger: "Re: Patches for saned/net/scanimage/user-authorization...."
  - Previous message: Henning Meier-Geinitz: "Re: Patches for saned/net/scanimage/user-authorization...."
  - Next in thread: Henning Meier-Geinitz: "Re: reaction to a smaller buffer size"
  - Reply: Henning Meier-Geinitz: "Re: reaction to a smaller buffer size"
  - Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

  This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Nov 18 2000 - 12:57:36 PST