# Re: problems with snapscan and scanimage

Kenneth Crudup (kenny@panix.com)
Thu, 14 May 1998 13:38:59 -0400 (EDT)

- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
- Next message: Graham Stoney: "Re: Win32 TWAIN DLL to interface with SANE"
- Previous message: Warren Early: "Re: problems with snapscan and scanimage"
- Maybe in reply to: KH Jeron: "problems with snapscan and scanimage"
- Next in thread: Rob Fargher: "Re: problems with snapscan and scanimage"

I don't know how others feel about this, but in my opinion it is best
to default to scan the _entire_ scan surface by default. The
experiences with the Microtek and SnapScan backend seem to indicate
that anything else simply confuses the (naive) user.

Agreed.

-Kenny, Microtek backend user with his E-6

    --
    Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/
    To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com

- Next message: Graham Stoney: "Re: Win32 TWAIN DLL to interface with SANE"
- Previous message: Warren Early: "Re: problems with snapscan and scanimage"
- Maybe in reply to: KH Jeron: "problems with snapscan and scanimage"
- Next in thread: Rob Fargher: "Re: problems with snapscan and scanimage"