# Re: RPM packaging in progress

From: Oliver Rauch (oliver.rauch@Wolfsburg.DE)
Date: Sun Jan 07 2001 - 01:20:44 PST

- Next message: Christoph Knauer: "sane,saned und XSane/Windows"
  - Previous message: Hawke: "need info and/or driver for symbios sym53c400A scsi adaptor"
  - In reply to: Hugo.van.der.Kooij@caiw.nl: "Re: RPM packaging in progress"
  - Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

  Hugo.van.der.Kooij@caiw.nl wrote:

  > The mystery behind this decision does escape me. I ran 1.0.1 for a long
  > time without having to change things like this. Does any of the coders
  > have a clue why -O2 would be a problem?
  >

  Hello Hugo,

  There was a problem with optimization "-O2" about 1 or 2 years ago
  on some systems (original slackware?). The problem was that with
  enabled optimization "-O2" the compiler produced so much additional
  symbols that a maximum number (I think predefined in the compiler/linker)
  was exceeded while compiling the umax backend (and may be other backends too).

  Optimization level "-O2" should produce correct code.

  Bye
  Oliver

      --
      Homepage:	http://www.wolfsburg.de/~rauch
      sane-umax:	http://www.wolfsburg.de/~rauch/sane/sane-umax.html
      xsane:		http://www.wolfsburg.de/~rauch/sane/sane-xsane.html
      E-Mail:		mailto:Oliver.Rauch@Wolfsburg.DE
      --
      Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/
      To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com

  - Next message: Christoph Knauer: "sane,saned und XSane/Windows"
  - Previous message: Hawke: "need info and/or driver for symbios sym53c400A scsi adaptor"
  - In reply to: Hugo.van.der.Kooij@caiw.nl: "Re: RPM packaging in progress"
  - Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

  This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 07 2001 - 01:18:00 PST