# Re: make dll.c robust against it being listed in its configuration file...

From: Petter Reinholdtsen (pere@hungry.com)
Date: Thu Oct 19 2000 - 20:12:35 PDT

- Next message: Petter Reinholdtsen: "Re: sane fronten packages"
  - Previous message: Jeff Martin: "Epson 610 not Microtek Scanmaker 3700 USB"
  - Maybe in reply to: Jochen Eisinger: "make dll.c robust against it being listed in its configuration file..."
  - Next in thread: Jochen Eisinger: "Re: make dll.c robust against it being listed in its configuration file..."
  - Reply: Jochen Eisinger: "Re: make dll.c robust against it being listed in its configuration file..."
  - Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

  [Jochen Eisinger]
  > What about just checking the backend name against "dll" while
  > reading the dll.conf? This avoids that dll segfaults if dll is
  > listed in the dll.conf.

  Why do dll segfault? Shouldn't this be fixed first?

  I have not tested the patch, but it looks OK to me. I only suspect it
  might be the wrong fix. :-)

      --
      ##>  Petter Reinholdtsen  <##  |  pere@td.org.uit.no
      --
      Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/
      To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com

  - Next message: Petter Reinholdtsen: "Re: sane fronten packages"
  - Previous message: Jeff Martin: "Epson 610 not Microtek Scanmaker 3700 USB"
  - Maybe in reply to: Jochen Eisinger: "make dll.c robust against it being listed in its configuration file..."
  - Next in thread: Jochen Eisinger: "Re: make dll.c robust against it being listed in its configuration file..."
  - Reply: Jochen Eisinger: "Re: make dll.c robust against it being listed in its configuration file..."
  - Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

  This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Oct 19 2000 - 20:02:27 PDT