# Re: Microtek ScanMaker V300?

Bernd Schroeder (bernd@aquila.muc.de)
Sat, 26 Sep 1998 15:51:48 +0200

- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
- Next message: Bernd Schroeder: "Re: Microtek ScanMaker X6EL supported??"
- Previous message: David B. Rees: "Re: Microtek ScanMaker V300?"

Hi,

On Fri, Sep 25, 1998 at 02:40:59AM -0700, David B. Rees wrote:

> [microtek2] scsi_set_window: ms=0x80ba898, wnd=1
> [microtek2] scsi_read_image_info: ms=0x80ba898
> [microtek2] scsi_read_image_info: ppl=40109874, bpl=55181335, lines=-1435184639,
> remain=739183094
> [microtek2] sane_start: Scan buffer too small

The "set window" command sets all the options of a scan like scan area,
resolution,... "read image information" then reads how many pixels per line,
(ppl), bytes per line (bpl) etc. the image has. For some reason the
numbers above are completely wrong.

I am wondering, why this happens, because the above command sequence is
relatively independent of the model, and I have never seen that before.

Bernd

    --
    Bernd Schroeder
    Email: mailto:bernd@aquila.muc.de
    PGP public key available: mailto:pgp@aquila.muc.de | Subject: send key

    --
    Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/
    To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com

     Next message: Bernd Schroeder: "Re: Microtek ScanMaker X6EL supported??"
     Previous message: David B. Rees: "Re: Microtek ScanMaker V300?"