# Re: Snapscan 310

Neil Zampella (neilz@techie.com)
Mon, 01 Mar 1999 20:30:26 -0500 (EST)

- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
- Next message: Tony Simaz: "HP 4C Scanner and SANE"
- Previous message: becka@rz.uni-duesseldorf.de: "Re: SCSI not detected"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Mon, 1 Mar 1999 13:13:11 +0100 (MET), Ole W. Saastad wrote:

:>
:>I have installed SANE with snapscan support, and this works very well.
:>However, the Photolook scans look better.
:>(see my www page http://www.uio.no/~olews/scanner.html)
:>
:>I am therfore wondering about the progress for the snapscan 310 backend.
:>As I can see from the www page of Kevin Charter there is only limited
:>development going on.
:>
:>I have written to Agfa and inquiered about support for Linux with
:>negative results. (Interesting reply to read by the way)
:>

Ole .. can you give us a short synopsis of what they said .. although I suspect NO WAY was the gist of the
reply.

:>Will there be more devlopment for the snapscan 310 ?
:>
:>Are there many users of the snapscan who are interested in updating
:>of the driver for this scanner ?
:>
:>
:>
:>Best regards
:>Ole W Saastad
:>
:>
:>--
:>Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/
:>To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com
:>

Neil Zampella

Why do I use OS/2 ??
Because I like choice !!

PGP Public Key Fingerprint= 6082 7AD3 CFA1 FA0E 191B 9F0B 52ED 0716 5731 B7A1

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 5.0 OS/2 for non-commercial use
Comment: PGP 5.0 for OS/2
Charset: cp850

wj8DBQE22zEgUu0HFlcxt6ERAt0zAKC3DJj2UbUWMmXl/Stdqgy8osvKUgCg3h8S
O1gi2wVDPuORUaVTcXdjAs0=
=BUpI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

    --
    Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/
    To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com

- Next message: Tony Simaz: "HP 4C Scanner and SANE"
- Previous message: becka@rz.uni-duesseldorf.de: "Re: SCSI not detected"