# Re: support for HP 3400C or 4300C?

From: Levente NOVAK (novak@jaguar.dote.hu)
Date: Sat Feb 10 2001 - 08:32:25 PST

- Next message: Karsten Festag: "Re: Microtek X6, USB and slackware problems"
  - Previous message: Peter Kirchgessner: "Re: Preview problems on Solaris Sparc"
  - In reply to: Jonathan Buzzard: "Re: support for HP 3400C or 4300C?"
  - Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

  On Sat, 10 Feb 2001, Jonathan Buzzard wrote:

  >
  > You have checked the parallel port Sane/Linux scanner page? Performance is
  > so crap with parallel scanners that I would avoid them like the plague.
  >

  My Microtek Phantom 636cx parallel scanner is very fast compared to an old
  3-pass SCSI Microtek scanner we had at the lab (so it is not _always_ true
  that parallel scanners are slower than SCSI ones). I have to admit though,
  that even the with the valuable work of Karsten Festag on the microtek2
  backend, I still have problems in getting good pictures (but at least for
  some resolutions and image sizes, the scans are quite OK).

  Levente

      --
      Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/
      To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com

  - Next message: Karsten Festag: "Re: Microtek X6, USB and slackware problems"
  - Previous message: Peter Kirchgessner: "Re: Preview problems on Solaris Sparc"
  - In reply to: Jonathan Buzzard: "Re: support for HP 3400C or 4300C?"
  - Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

  This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Feb 10 2001 - 08:35:01 PST