# Re: HP 5200C -- segfaults and "inappropriate ioctl for device"

From: Henning Meier-Geinitz (henning@meier-geinitz.de)
Date: Mon May 14 2001 - 10:44:38 PDT

- Next message: Oliver Schwartz: "Re: Snapscan ... again"
  - Previous message: Oliver Rauch: "Re: DBG(0, ...)"
  - In reply to: Claus Ladekjær Wilson: "Re: HP 5200C -- segfaults and "inappropriate ioctl for device""
  - Next in thread: Claus Ladekjær Wilson: "Re: HP 5200C -- segfaults and "inappropriate ioctl for device""
  - Reply: Claus Ladekjær Wilson: "Re: HP 5200C -- segfaults and "inappropriate ioctl for device""
  - Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

  Hi,

  On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 06:51:14PM +0000, Claus Ladekjær Wilson wrote:
  > scanimage has an option missing in xsane and xscanimage telling which the
  > device to use.

  If you are talking about "-d" you can do the same with xsane and
  xscanimage:

  xsane hp:/dev/usb/scanner0
  xscanimage hp:/dev/usb/scanner0

  Bye,
  Henning

      --
      Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/
      To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com

  - Next message: Oliver Schwartz: "Re: Snapscan ... again"
  - Previous message: Oliver Rauch: "Re: DBG(0, ...)"
  - In reply to: Claus Ladekjær Wilson: "Re: HP 5200C -- segfaults and "inappropriate ioctl for device""
  - Next in thread: Claus Ladekjær Wilson: "Re: HP 5200C -- segfaults and "inappropriate ioctl for device""
  - Reply: Claus Ladekjær Wilson: "Re: HP 5200C -- segfaults and "inappropriate ioctl for device""
  - Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

  This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon May 14 2001 - 10:31:20 PDT