# Re: Possible xsane bug?

Adam Williams (awilliam@whitemice.org)
Mon, 19 Jul 1999 01:15:03 +0000

- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
- Next message: Paul Waldo: "Re: Scanjet 5P and seg fault"
- Previous message: Bernd Schroeder: "Re: Microtek ScanMaker IV on Linux-2.2.10 (Redhat 6.0)"
- In reply to: Adam Williams: "Possible xsane bug?"
- Next in thread: Oliver Rauch: "Re: Possible xsane bug?"

> > When I use the copy function of xsane 0.29 it only produces the "bottom"
3/4 of
> > the page. In scan mode it seems to work correctly. My sane is 1.01 and my
> > scanner is a HP 4c. Is this a bug or am I missing something obvious (I
have
> > tried endless setting diddles).
> >
>
> Hi Adam,
>
> I tested it with my umax scanner and everything works fine.
>
> Is your zoomfactor to large?
>
> If you select scan mode: do you select the resolution with a slider
>
> or from a list?
>

The zoom factor on the slider is at it's default of 1. I discovered I have to
put the page in the middle of the scanner, even if I pick size letter in the
preview window. I assumed you would put on the same starting point you use in
scanning? Is that a mistaked assumption?

    --
    Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/
    To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com

- Next message: Paul Waldo: "Re: Scanjet 5P and seg fault"
- Previous message: Bernd Schroeder: "Re: Microtek ScanMaker IV on Linux-2.2.10 (Redhat 6.0)"
- In reply to: Adam Williams: "Possible xsane bug?"
- Next in thread: Oliver Rauch: "Re: Possible xsane bug?"