# Re: big endian vs little endian

From: Oliver Rauch (oliver.rauch@rauch-domain.de)
Date: Fri Mar 30 2001 - 14:01:08 PST

- Next message: Mick Barry: "Re: big endian vs little endian"
  - Previous message: Stephen Williams: "Re: Scan ahead"
  - In reply to: William L. Sebok: "big endian vs little endian"
  - Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

  "William L. Sebok" wrote:
  > Has anyone else had this problem? Does the sane protocol have provision for
  > the case where front and back ends are on machines with different byte orders?

  Hi William,

  the sane-network protocol defines that the byte order has to be
  fixed in the network environment (sane-net/saned) when
  the frontend and backend do run on machines with differend endianess.

  I do not know if this already is implemented in the current version.

  Bye
  Oliver

      --
      Homepage:	http://www.rauch-domain.de
      sane-umax:	http://www.rauch-domain.de/sane-umax
      xsane:		http://www.xsane.org
      E-Mail:		mailto:Oliver.Rauch@rauch-domain.de
      --
      Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/
      To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com

  - Next message: Mick Barry: "Re: big endian vs little endian"
  - Previous message: Stephen Williams: "Re: Scan ahead"
  - In reply to: William L. Sebok: "big endian vs little endian"
  - Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

  This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Mar 30 2001 - 15:00:57 PST