# Re: General USB questions and comments

From: Oliver Neukum (Oliver.Neukum@lrz.uni-muenchen.de)
Date: Sun Jan 07 2001 - 22:03:38 PST

- Next message: Henning Meier-Geinitz: "Re: General USB questions and comments"
  - Previous message: Jürgen Koslowski: "Re: Polaroid Sprintscan 4000?"
  - In reply to: Henning Meier-Geinitz: "Re: General USB questions and comments"
  - Next in thread: Henning Meier-Geinitz: "Re: General USB questions and comments"
  - Reply: Henning Meier-Geinitz: "Re: General USB questions and comments"
  - Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

  > > You cannot assume that the first device is usbscanner0. While a device is
  > > plugged in, it's device node doesn't change. Note: You can't tell easily
  > > whether it was replugged.
  >
  > I may be wrong but all this doesn't look like scanner.o had more then
  > one scanner in mind. Looks pretty weird.

  It's hard to find an alternative. A system based on physical location in the
  tree would quickly exhaust all available device node space.

  Regards
  Oliver

      --
      Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/
      To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com

  - Next message: Henning Meier-Geinitz: "Re: General USB questions and comments"
  - Previous message: Jürgen Koslowski: "Re: Polaroid Sprintscan 4000?"
  - In reply to: Henning Meier-Geinitz: "Re: General USB questions and comments"
  - Next in thread: Henning Meier-Geinitz: "Re: General USB questions and comments"
  - Reply: Henning Meier-Geinitz: "Re: General USB questions and comments"
  - Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

  This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 07 2001 - 21:48:09 PST