# Re: Xsane - winsane? was Re: saned won't run under inetd

From: Nick Lamb (njl98r@ecs.soton.ac.uk)
Date: Fri May 11 2001 - 12:15:28 PDT

- Next message: Jan Keirse: "2 little questions"
  - Previous message: Paul Nixon: "Re: Xsane - winsane? was Re: saned won't run under inetd"
  - In reply to: Paul Nixon: "Re: Xsane - winsane? was Re: saned won't run under inetd"
  - Next in thread: Paul Nixon: "Re: Xsane - winsane? was Re: saned won't run under inetd"
  - Reply: Paul Nixon: "Re: Xsane - winsane? was Re: saned won't run under inetd"
  - Reply: Paul Nixon: "Re: Xsane - winsane? was Re: saned won't run under inetd"
  - Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

  On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 11:53:55AM -0700, Paul Nixon wrote:
  > Anyway, I have *fixed* the scanner not found error I received earlier by
  > relinking libsane.so.1 to libsane-snapscan.so.1.0.4.

  That is almost certainly not what you wanted, even if it works. It will
  prevent you from using another non-Snapscan scanner or a network scanner.

  > Now, any chance someone might know what's causing my scanned image to look
  > like it's been put through the shredder?? Once again, greyscale and lineart
  > are fine. Color looks like it scans a bit then staircases, scans a bit, and
  > so on.

  It's quite possible that this is a backend problem.

  > I thought xscanimage was a frontend to scanimage. Is this not so? Scanimage
  > produces a perfect scan. Xsane-0.76 is also shredded, just not quite as bad.

  No, scanimage and xscanimage are separate front ends, the only similarity
  is the name and common contributors AFAIK.

  Nick.

      --
      Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/
      To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com

  - Next message: Jan Keirse: "2 little questions"
  - Previous message: Paul Nixon: "Re: Xsane - winsane? was Re: saned won't run under inetd"
  - In reply to: Paul Nixon: "Re: Xsane - winsane? was Re: saned won't run under inetd"
  - Next in thread: Paul Nixon: "Re: Xsane - winsane? was Re: saned won't run under inetd"
  - Reply: Paul Nixon: "Re: Xsane - winsane? was Re: saned won't run under inetd"
  - Reply: Paul Nixon: "Re: Xsane - winsane? was Re: saned won't run under inetd"
  - Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

  This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri May 11 2001 - 12:01:12 PDT