# Re: UMAX and UTA?

wolfgang Rapp (ulris@bn-ulm.de)
Fri, 11 Jun 1999 21:07:24 +0200

- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
- Next message: Oliver Rauch: "Re: UMAX and UTA?"
- Previous message: Oliver Rauch: "Re: UMAX and UTA?"
- Maybe in reply to: Oliver Rauch: "UMAX and UTA?"
- Next in thread: Oliver Rauch: "Re: UMAX and UTA?"

Oliver Rauch wrote:
>
> if you do a preview scan, is the maximum scanarea ok and is the top left edge
> of the scanned image the top left edge of the uta-scanning area, or do you have
> any
> areas that are not usable for scanning?
>
> Bye
> Oliver
>

The scan aera length for the UTA is smaller then for flat scans.
But the maximal scan area for UTA is marked at the scanner. The scanner
use
the missing length at top window for calibrating. This small window must
be open. BTW the microtek do the same for calibrating and have also
less scan length with a UTA.

But now your question. Prescan an scan work well in the reduced scan
area all is ok. Unfortenately the scanner is at my office but if I
remember right I must position the film at the right top edge of the
scanner and it appears at top left in prescan and scan.
It is not clear if it is mirrored left<->right. What is the upper side
of
a film? Should we place it up down like paper with a UTA??
If I am back at office at monday I will check out the exact working
of the UTA. I will report.

Bye
Wolfgang

    --
    Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/
    To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com

- Next message: Oliver Rauch: "Re: UMAX and UTA?"
- Previous message: Oliver Rauch: "Re: UMAX and UTA?"
- Maybe in reply to: Oliver Rauch: "UMAX and UTA?"
- Next in thread: Oliver Rauch: "Re: UMAX and UTA?"