# Re: "Standard" or "best" image format?

From: Karl Heinz Kremer (khk@khk.net)
Date: Sat May 13 2000 - 19:33:38 PDT

- Next message: Steve Underwood: "Snapscan backend"
  - Previous message: Nick Lamb: "Re: "Standard" or "best" image format?"
  - In reply to: Nick Lamb: "Re: "Standard" or "best" image format?"
  - Next in thread: Bill Wohler: "Re: "Standard" or "best" image format?"
  - Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

  On Sun, May 14, 2000 at 03:02:12AM +0100, Nick Lamb wrote:
  >
  > For pixel fairy, but Reply-To: List is set so...
  >
  > On Sat, May 13, 2000 at 04:10:24PM -0700, pixel fairy wrote:
  > > another problem is again, photoshop. for some reason
  > > it stores black and white images as 2 channel tiffs
  > > that nothing in linux can read.
  >
  > Send me one when you have it to hand and I'll stick it in my
  > TODO pile. Wild and wonderful TIFF formats are usually ten
  > minutes (oh, but ten minutes each, and there are seemingly an
  > infinite number). Try to make it obvious what it's supposed
  > to look like, or include a JPEG.
  >
  > One day Gimp will load everything :)

  So you will include my Lab stuff (once it's completed and actually
  working) as well? :-)

  Karl Heinz

      --
      Karl Heinz Kremer                                      khk@khk.net
                                                      http://www.khk.net

  - application/pgp-signature attachment: stored

      --
      Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/
      To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com

  - Next message: Steve Underwood: "Snapscan backend"
  - Previous message: Nick Lamb: "Re: "Standard" or "best" image format?"
  - In reply to: Nick Lamb: "Re: "Standard" or "best" image format?"
  - Next in thread: Bill Wohler: "Re: "Standard" or "best" image format?"
  - Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

  This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat May 13 2000 - 19:31:05 PDT