# Re: new snapshot?

From: Petter Reinholdtsen (pere@hungry.com)
Date: Thu Feb 03 2000 - 23:32:58 PST

- Next message: abel deuring: "Re: SG_BIG_BUFF setting in Problems incorrect"
  - Previous message: Bill Wohler: "Re: SG_BIG_BUFF setting in Problems incorrect"
  - Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

  [Bill Wohler]
  > Just so it's clear, you mean that "cvs update -d -rDEVEL_1_9" is
  > correct, but unnecessary (because the snapshot includes CVS/Tag
  > files).

  Yes.

  > The reason I ask is that those of us who have gotten the sources
  > directly via CVS and not via the snapshot who want the latest and
  > greatest should be using "cvs update -d -rDEVEL_1_9" and not "cvs
  > update -d". Right?

  If you followed the description on
  <URL:http://www.student.uit.no/~pere/linux/sane/cvs-server.html> you
  will already have a CVS copy of DEVEL_1_9. If you checked out the
  source without -rDEVEL_1_9, you will need to specify it during 'cvs
  update -d' to get the current development version.

  > By the way, the documentation bug I reported earlier is the only
  > thing I've seen so far. scanimage is otherwise working fine (HP
  > Photosmart SCSI on Linux 2.2.1).

  I hope smarter people the me will comment on the SCSI problems you
  discovered. :-)

  I am glad the current CVS version works fine. If everything goes
  well, we will have a new release soon. :-)

      --
      ##>  Petter Reinholdtsen <##    | pere@td.org.uit.no
       O-  <SCRIPT Language="Javascript">window.close()</SCRIPT>
      http://www.hungry.com/~pere/    | Go Mozilla, go! Go!
      --
      Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/
      To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com

  - Next message: abel deuring: "Re: SG_BIG_BUFF setting in Problems incorrect"
  - Previous message: Bill Wohler: "Re: SG_BIG_BUFF setting in Problems incorrect"
  - Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

  This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Feb 03 2000 - 23:26:49 PST