# Re: SANE frames

Oliver Rauch (oliver.rauch@Wolfsburg.DE)
Tue, 17 Aug 1999 19:07:57 +0200

- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
- Next message: Nick Lamb: "Re: SANE frames"
- Previous message: Oliver Rauch: "Re: Starting a discussion about SANE and TWAIN..."
- Maybe in reply to: Stephen Williams: "SANE frames"
- Next in thread: Oliver Rauch: "Re: SANE frames"

David Mosberger-Tang wrote:

> Actually, IIRC, our intent was indeed to allow the call sequence that
> Tom describes. Note that in 4.4 it says:
>
> "If the frontend expects additional frames (e.g., the individual channels
> in of a red/green/blue image or multiple images), it can call sane_start()
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> again."

Hi David,

Although I think the definition is not clean at that point it is ok to
do so if it is ment that way.

I think we need to specify the code flow for multiple images that are
acquired with one scan and a code flow for multi page scan (adf).

I hope the exisiting backends are able to handle this!

Bye
Oliver

    --
    EMAIL: Oliver.Rauch@Wolfsburg.DE
    WWW: http://www.wolfsburg.de/~rauch

    --
    Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/
    To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com

     Next message: Nick Lamb: "Re: SANE frames"
     Previous message: Oliver Rauch: "Re: Starting a discussion about SANE and TWAIN..."
     Maybe in reply to: Stephen Williams: "SANE frames"

     Next in thread: Oliver Rauch: "Re: SANE frames"