# XPhotocopy question

Tobias Ernst (tobi@bland.fido.de)
Sat, 17 Oct 1998 18:30:38 +0200

- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
- Next message: Wolfgang Goeller: "Re: Does anybody recognize this inquiry information ?"
- Previous message: Bernd Schroeder: "Does anybody recognize this inquiry information ?"
- Next in thread: Oliver Rauch: "Re: XPhotocopy question"
- Reply: Oliver Rauch: "Re: XPhotocopy question"

* Reply to message originally in area TOS2.VERTEILER.SANE

Hallo Oliver!

OR> much to big. Then I think again a more text based user interface
OR> (like xscanimage) is much better, because it gets much smaller and you can

OR> run it on a small desktop (eg 800x600 or 640x480) too.

Speaking of it, xscanimage can't be run on a 800x600 desktop. At least if you
choose some advanced options, the window get's too tall to fit onto the screen.

This is surely a disadvantage e.g. for notebook users like me. (I could connect
an external monitor to my Thinkpad and run 1024x768, but the display quality is
very limited there due to the usually bad quality of notebook clock chips etc.,
so I decided not to stick with the lower resolution but superb quality of the
built-in TFT).

Regards,
Tobias

    --
    Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/
    To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com

- Next message: Wolfgang Goeller: "Re: Does anybody recognize this inquiry information ?"
- Previous message: Bernd Schroeder: "Does anybody recognize this inquiry information ?"
- Next in thread: Oliver Rauch: "Re: XPhotocopy question"
- Reply: Oliver Rauch: "Re: XPhotocopy question"