# Re: SANE frames

Nick Lamb (njl98r@ecs.soton.ac.uk)
Wed, 18 Aug 1999 12:26:37 +0100 (GMT)

- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
- Next message: Sebastian Ahrens: "canon fs 2710 unde linux?"
- Previous message: Tobias Goeller: "Re: Mustek Paragon 1200SP"
- In reply to: Andreas Dilger: "Re: SANE frames"

On Tue, 17 Aug 1999, Andreas Dilger wrote:

> It would probably be more compatible to have the flag be "another_frame"
> instead of "last_frame", because no current backends will know to set
> the "last_frame" bit, but ADF scanners could be changed to set a new
> "another_frame" flag.

Andreas, I can't take your proposals seriously when you write stuff like
this. ALL EXISTING BACKENDS KNOW ABOUT last_frame IT IS IN SANE 1.0

Therefore, please read my post again, and come back with a criticism
written when you're not half asleep.

Nick.

    --
    Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/
    To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com

- Next message: Sebastian Ahrens: "canon fs 2710 unde linux?"
- Previous message: Tobias Goeller: "Re: Mustek Paragon 1200SP"
- In reply to: Andreas Dilger: "Re: SANE frames"