# is lalloca.h installed on any system? [was:#include <sane...> instead of "sane..."]

From: Oliver Rauch (oliver.rauch@Wolfsburg.DE)
Date: Sat Nov 04 2000 - 23:41:43 PST

- Next message: Oliver Rauch: "Re: #include <sane...> instead of "sane...""
  - Previous message: Timothy Little: "Re: [snapscan] Agfa 1212U problems?"
  - In reply to: Jochen Eisinger: "Re: #include <sane...> instead of "sane...""
  - Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

  Jochen Eisinger wrote:
  >
  > Hi!
  >
  > [Oliver Rauch]
  > > In the manpage of getopt it is described that
  > > #include <getopt.h> should be done. So it has
  > > to be used or we get problems when getopt is
  > > available at the system.
  > >
  > > With lalloca.h I don`t know but I don`t see
  > > a problem here to keep it as it is.
  >
  > The problem I saw was that some backends #include "lalloca.h" and some
  > use <lalloca.h>
  >
  >

  Hi,

  does anyone know if lalloca.h is installed on any system?
  if not, we should use "lalloca.h" or "../include/lalloca.h"
  otherwise we should use <lalloca.h>

  Bye
  Oliver

  -
  Homepage: http://www.wolfsburg.de/~rauch
  sane-umax: http://www.wolfsburg.de/~rauch/sane/sane-umax.html
  xsane: http://www.wolfsburg.de/~rauch/sane/sane-xsane.html
  E-Mail: mailto:Oliver.Rauch@Wolfsburg.DE

      --
      Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/
      To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com

  - Next message: Oliver Rauch: "Re: #include <sane...> instead of "sane...""
  - Previous message: Timothy Little: "Re: [snapscan] Agfa 1212U problems?"
  - In reply to: Jochen Eisinger: "Re: #include <sane...> instead of "sane...""
  - Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

  This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Nov 04 2000 - 23:54:48 PST