# Re: Doubt - Can a scanner be faster on Windows 98 than on Linux?

Oliver Rauch (oliver.rauch@Wolfsburg.DE)
Sun, 17 Oct 1999 19:39:40 +0200

- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
- Next message: joakim verona: "problem getting a snapscan to work"
- Previous message: Oliver Rauch: "Re: Umax Vista-S8 -- anyone get this working under linux/BSD?"
- Maybe in reply to: Eduardo Mazoni Andrade Marcal Mendes: "Doubt - Can a scanner be faster on Windows 98 than on Linux?"

Eduardo Mazoni Andrade Marcal Mendes wrote:

> Hello
> I have been struggling to get my old UMax T-630 to work with sane
> for almost six months. I decided
> to start from scratch again just to see if I can find the missing
> point. As usual there is a very simple
> question that is getting in the way:
> Why my scanner works fine and fast with Adobe Photoshop
> 3.05-VistaScan 2.30 on Windows 98? When
> I switch to caldera 2.3-sane-1.0.1 is a completely different story: i)
> the scanner scans with tiny steps
> (so tiny that I can go for lunch and the thingy is still going) and ii)
> crashes with error messages at the
> end of the whole scanning process (that is, no image). What is going on?
>
> Thanks for your help.
>
> Ed
>

Hi Ed,

please try the new umax driver from my homepage!

Bye
Oliver

    --
    EMAIL: Oliver.Rauch@Wolfsburg.DE
    WWW: http://www.wolfsburg.de/~rauch

    --
    Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/
    To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com

     Next message: joakim verona: "problem getting a snapscan to work"
     Previous message: Oliver Rauch: "Re: Umax Vista-S8 -- anyone get this working under linux/BSD?"
     Maybe in reply to: Eduardo Mazoni Andrade Marcal Mendes: "Doubt - Can a scanner be faster on Windows 98 than on Linux?"