# What do I need to do to get high res?

John Brush (jbrush@aros.net)
Mon, 23 Nov 98 21:51:52 -0700

- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
- Next message: Milon Firikis: "Re: Too many options for xscanimage"
- Previous message: Chris Pinkham: "Re: sane-backends patch"
- In reply to: becka@rz.uni-duesseldorf.de: "Re: Mustek 12000 SP not working"
- Next in thread: Dr. Andreas Bolsch: "Re: Mustek 12000 SP not working"

I am just asking, not demanding or complaining :) about what it would
take, or who it will take, to upgrade Sane for OS/2 so that it can
scan better than 100dpi on a Microtek E3??

Is there someone I can bribe? :-) Is it an on-going project and just a
matter of time? Who should I contact about this particular version?

I understand it is all individuals working on each project, so I am
not expecting someone to just sit down and do it, but I would really
love to have Sane so that I can use the scanner in OS/2, as CFM Twain
is an overpriced, underfeatured piece of software, IMO, and there is
little else I am aware of for scannning in OS/2

Just wondering if I should even hold out hope, or drop the $50+ for
the inferior CFM drivers.

Thanks a lot.

Best Regards,

John

    --
    Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/
    To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com

- Next message: Milon Firikis: "Re: Too many options for xscanimage"
- Previous message: Chris Pinkham: "Re: sane-backends patch"
- In reply to: becka@rz.uni-duesseldorf.de: "Re: Mustek 12000 SP not working"
- Next in thread: Dr. Andreas Bolsch: "Re: Mustek 12000 SP not working"