# Re: problems with snapscan and scanimage

charter@cs.ualberta.ca
Wed, 13 May 1998 23:56:47 -0600 (MDT)

- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
- Next message: David Mosberger-Tang: "Re: sane 0.73 pre-test patch"
- Previous message: Matto Marjanovic: "Re: sane 0.73 pre-test patch"
- In reply to: Daniel Stephens: "Re: problems with snapscan and scanimage"
- Next in thread: Warren Early: "Re: problems with snapscan and scanimage"

>
> > I don't know how others feel about this, but in my opinion it is best
> > to default to scan the _entire_ scan surface by default. The
> > experiences with the Microtek and SnapScan backend seem to indicate
> > that anything else simply confuses the (naive) user.
>
> I would be inclined to throw in my $0.02 and stand behind David's opinion,
> by default it should scan what can be scanned.. Ideally the user interface to
> the scanner software should make it very straightforward to crop the
> scanning area if so desired.

OK, I'm agreed. As soon as I get a chance I'll change the default scan area.

Kevin

    --
    Kevin Charter                        /\                      Grad Studies
    charter@cs.ualberta.ca            /\/  \  Department of Computing Science
    http://web.cs.ualberta.ca/~charter  \   --------    University of Alberta
    	       		             --------------    Edmonton AB CANADA

    --
    Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/
    To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com

     Next message: David Mosberger-Tang: "Re: sane 0.73 pre-test patch"
     Previous message: Matto Marjanovic: "Re: sane 0.73 pre-test patch"
     In reply to: Daniel Stephens: "Re: problems with snapscan and scanimage"

     Next in thread: Warren Early: "Re: problems with snapscan and scanimage"