# Re: sane and gcc 2.96

From: Michael Vanecek (mike@mjv.com)
Date: Sun Nov 19 2000 - 15:23:45 PST

- Next message: Nick Lamb: "Re: sane and gcc 2.96"
  - Previous message: Henning Meier-Geinitz: "Re: sane and gcc 2.96"
  - In reply to: Statux: "Re: sane and gcc 2.96"
  - Next in thread: Nick Lamb: "Re: sane and gcc 2.96"
  - Next in thread: Henning Meier-Geinitz: "Re: sane and gcc 2.96"
  - Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

  Oh fart. And I just got finished compiling the monster. It's version
  2.96-54 if anyone knows the answer to the question below. Should I ditch
  the freshly made RPM's and go out and download the src.rpm's for 2.95.2
  (the Mandrake should work for RH, right?). I guess I could always
  download a tarball and write my own spec file... this bleeding edge
  stuff can get nervy sometimes. I'd like to get a clean compile of sane
  using what the core developers are using.

  Mike

  Statux wrote:
  >
  > Did they ever fix their _little_ problem with gcc 2.96 and the fact that
  > they didn't even bother to note that it's a development version that
  > produces incompatible object code.. such code that will never work with
  > anything else even in future releases?
  >
  > On Sun, 19 Nov 2000, Michael Vanecek wrote:
  >
  > > Has anyone compiled with gcc 2.96 yet? I've got the RH version
  > > downloading now and am curious if there have been any problems...
  > >
  > > Mike
  > >
  > > --
  > > Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/
  > > To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com
  > >
  >
  > --
  > -Statux
  >
  > --
  > Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/
  > To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com

      --
      Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/
      To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com

  - Next message: Nick Lamb: "Re: sane and gcc 2.96"
  - Previous message: Henning Meier-Geinitz: "Re: sane and gcc 2.96"
  - In reply to: Statux: "Re: sane and gcc 2.96"
  - Next in thread: Nick Lamb: "Re: sane and gcc 2.96"
  - Next in thread: Henning Meier-Geinitz: "Re: sane and gcc 2.96"
  - Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

  This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Nov 19 2000 - 15:19:12 PST