# SG_BIG_BUFF, glibc 2.1 weirdness ...

Petter Reinholdtsen (pere@hungry.com)
Sun, 15 Aug 1999 17:47:31 +0200

- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
- Next message: Oliver Rauch: "Re: SG_BIG_BUFF, glibc 2.1 weirdness ..."
- Previous message: Stephen Williams: "Re: Starting a discussion about SANE and TWAIN..."
- Next in thread: Oliver Rauch: "Re: SG_BIG_BUFF, glibc 2.1 weirdness ..."
- Reply: Oliver Rauch: "Re: SG_BIG_BUFF, glibc 2.1 weirdness ..."
- Reply: Andreas Beck: "Re: SG_BIG_BUFF, glibc 2.1 weirdness ..."
- Reply: abel deuring: "Re: SG_BIG_BUFF, glibc 2.1 weirdness ..."
- Reply: abel deuring: "Re: SG_BIG_BUFF, glibc 2.1 weirdness ..."

[Andreas Beck]
> I'd volunteer to help on the coding, but I'll at least need a
> coauthor that is willing to run 2.1.6 or above and take care for the
> support of the new kernel sg driver code.

I have a test machine running 2.2.10. Will that do?

    --
    ##>  Petter Reinholdtsen <##    | pere@td.org.uit.no
     O-  <SCRIPT Language="Javascript">window.close()</SCRIPT>
    http://www.hungry.com/~pere/    | Go Mozilla, go! Go!

    --
    Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/
    To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com

     Next message: Oliver Rauch: "Re: SG_BIG_BUFF, glibc 2.1 weirdness ..."
     Previous message: Stephen Williams: "Re: Starting a discussion about SANE and TWAIN..."

     Next in thread: Oliver Rauch: "Re: SG_BIG_BUFF, glibc 2.1 weirdness ..."
     Reply: Oliver Rauch: "Re: SG_BIG_BUFF, glibc 2.1 weirdness ..."
     Reply: Andreas Beck: "Re: SG_BIG_BUFF, glibc 2.1 weirdness ..."
     Reply: abel deuring: "Re: SG_BIG_BUFF, glibc 2.1 weirdness ..."
     Reply: abel deuring: "Re: SG_BIG_BUFF, glibc 2.1 weirdness ..."