# Re: /proc/scsi/scsi

Oliver.Rauch@Wolfsburg.DE
Mon, 13 Apr 1998 20:33:28 +0200 (MET DST)

- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
- Next message: Oliver.Rauch@Wolfsburg.DE: "Re: /proc/scsi/scsi"
- Previous message: Oliver.Rauch@Wolfsburg.DE: "Re: SANE 0.72 + UMAX Astra 610S + Always IN2000 = No Joy :("
- In reply to: Michael K. Johnson: "Re: /proc/scsi/scsi"
- Next in thread: Nicolas Lucas de Peslouan: "Re: /proc/scsi/scsi"

Hello Michael,

> All HP scanners ident as a "CPU". Only scanners which implement something
> remotely resembling the SCSI-II spec part 14 even ought to ident as
> scanners; the HP has it's own wacky protocol that has no relationship
> whatsoever to part 14.

I know, that's the reason why I don't use the scanner-type in the moment,
but it would be possible to use it in future if a device answers with
type 6 (scanner).

Bye
Oliver

    --
    Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/
    To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com

- Next message: Oliver.Rauch@Wolfsburg.DE: "Re: /proc/scsi/scsi"
- Previous message: Oliver.Rauch@Wolfsburg.DE: "Re: SANE 0.72 + UMAX Astra 610S + Always IN2000 = No Joy :("
- In reply to: Michael K. Johnson: "Re: /proc/scsi/scsi"
- Next in thread: Nicolas Lucas de Peslouan: "Re: /proc/scsi/scsi"