# Re: Xsane - winsane? was Re: saned won't run under inetd

From: Henning Meier-Geinitz (henning@meier-geinitz.de)
Date: Sat May 12 2001 - 10:15:54 PDT

- Next message: regis rampnoux: "Re: Snapscan ... again"
  - Previous message: Frederik Ramm: "Re: Snapscan ... again"
  - In reply to: Paul Nixon: "Re: Xsane - winsane? was Re: saned won't run under inetd"
  - Next in thread: Paul Nixon: "Re: Xsane - winsane? was Re: saned won't run under inetd"
  - Next in thread: Henning Meier-Geinitz: "Re: Xsane - winsane? was Re: saned won't run under inetd"
  - Reply: Paul Nixon: "Re: Xsane - winsane? was Re: saned won't run under inetd"
  - Reply: Paul Nixon: "Re: Xsane - winsane? was Re: saned won't run under inetd"
  - Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

  Hi,

  On Sat, May 12, 2001 at 09:00:02AM -0700, Paul Nixon wrote:
  > After reading what you posted about other sane files I did some checking.
  > I've got remnants from at least 3 versions of Sane installed on my system
  > (Sane-1.0.1, Sane-1.0.3, and Sane-1.0.4). My /usr/local/lib/sane directory
  > has entries such as:
  >
  > libsane-snapscan.so -> libsane-snapscan.so.1.0.4
  > libsane-snapscan.so.1 -> libsane-snapscan.so.1.0.1
  > libsane-snapscan.so.1.0.3

  The second one should also point to ibsane-snapscan.so.1.0.4. Where is
  libsane-snapscan.so.1.0.4?

  > So it seems my first order or business is to uninstall all previous versions
  > of sane. Is there a preferred method for that?

  Remove the libraries manually and reinstall from source. The
  configuration files won't be overwritten by this.

  rm -r /usr/local/lib/libsane* /usr/local/lib/sane /usr/lib/libsane* /usr/lib/sane

  > The link to v4l is caused by running ldconfig!

  Oops. May I ask again? Where is the link exactly (/usr/local/lib or
  /usr/local/lib/sane)? Could you please do a ls -l?
  I don't understand why ldconfig would do such things. If the link is
  in /usr/local/lib/sane/ then /etc/ld.so.conf contains
  "/usr/local/lib/sane".

  > libsane.so.1 -> libsane-dll.so.1.0.4 is how it is linked at present.

  On my system this isn't a link:

  ls -l /usr/local/lib/libsane*
  -rw-r--r-- 1 root staff 162912 Mai 12 12:49 /usr/local/lib/libsane.a
  -rwxr-xr-x 1 root staff 664 Mai 12 12:49 /usr/local/lib/libsane.la
  lrwxrwxrwx 1 root staff 16 Mai 12 12:49 /usr/local/lib/libsane.so -> libsane.so.1.0.4
  lrwxrwxrwx 1 root staff 16 Mai 12 12:49 /usr/local/lib/libsane.so.1 -> libsane.so.1.0.4
  -rwxr-xr-x 1 root staff 81965 Mai 12 12:49 /usr/local/lib/libsane.so.1.0.4

  /usr/local/lib/sane doesn't contain any libsane.* (and shouldn't).

  Happy scanning!

  Henning

      --
      Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/
      To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com

  - Next message: regis rampnoux: "Re: Snapscan ... again"
  - Previous message: Frederik Ramm: "Re: Snapscan ... again"
  - In reply to: Paul Nixon: "Re: Xsane - winsane? was Re: saned won't run under inetd"
  - Next in thread: Paul Nixon: "Re: Xsane - winsane? was Re: saned won't run under inetd"
  - Next in thread: Henning Meier-Geinitz: "Re: Xsane - winsane? was Re: saned won't run under inetd"
  - Reply: Paul Nixon: "Re: Xsane - winsane? was Re: saned won't run under inetd"
  - Reply: Paul Nixon: "Re: Xsane - winsane? was Re: saned won't run under inetd"
  - Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

  This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat May 12 2001 - 10:54:02 PDT