# Re: Saned screwing up???

Matto Marjanovic (maddog@mir.com)
Wed, 9 Dec 1998 00:32:02 -0500 (EST)

- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
- Next message: Chris Pinkham: "Re: Saned screwing up???"
- Previous message: Andre Couture: "Re: Saned screwing up???"
- Maybe in reply to: Andre Couture: "Saned screwing up???"
- Next in thread: Chris Pinkham: "Re: Saned screwing up???"
- Reply: Chris Pinkham: "Re: Saned screwing up???"

>> I've been trying for a while to get saned to work, but it the output is
>> looking very bad, (not aligned!)
>>
>> I have a AT3 scanner
>
>>From looking at the debugging output of saned and xscanimage, I believe
>this has to do with the fact that currently my implementation
>of the sane_read function does not like it when it is called with a
>max_len which is less than 1 line of data. I am working on changing

The microtek(1) backend had the same problem not too long ago.

As a suggestion to other backend developers, originally given to me by
David Mosberger-Tang, it's a really good idea to test out your backends
with saned, to catch such lapses.

-matt m.

    --
    Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/
    To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com

- Next message: Chris Pinkham: "Re: Saned screwing up???"
- Previous message: Andre Couture: "Re: Saned screwing up???"
- Maybe in reply to: Andre Couture: "Saned screwing up???"
- Next in thread: Chris Pinkham: "Re: Saned screwing up???"
- Reply: Chris Pinkham: "Re: Saned screwing up???"