# speed of the the latest cvs (yesterday) and Kernel 2.3.46

From: Rene Rebe (rene.rebe@myokay.net)
Date: Thu Feb 24 2000 - 13:27:06 PST

- Next message: Bill Wohler: "Re: xsane as root"
  - Previous message: Oliver Rauch: "Re: Permissions of /dev/sg* and xsane, xscanimage (was Re: Report on , last CVS snapshot)"
  - Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

  Hi, out there!

  /* I had to resend this, because I was subscribt with my old eMail-adr
  ... I hope it will only apear once ;-) */

  Because of the major improvements of the generic scsi interface in the
  2.3 kernel series (I thought there are some ...) I updated my server
  to the 2.3.46 Kernel and recompiled sane (yesterday-cvs).

  I wanted to make some benchmarks for my avision-backend web-page and
  noticed that this new combination is MUCH SLOWER!

  The Avision is connected to an Adaptec AHA-2940-U with pentium 120.

  With 2.2.12 and a end-january-cvs an a4 - 400dpi - color scan took
  180s.

  With 2.2.46 and the yesterday-cvs the same scan took 236s! Which is
  56s (31%) slower ...!

  Does anyone has the same problem?? Or maybe know what could be wrong??

  (I hope the english is "readable"...)

  k33p h4ck1n6 René

      --
      Registered Linux user: #127875
      Anyone sending unwanted advertising e-mail to this address will be charged
      $25 for network traffic and computing time. By extracting my address from
      this message or its header, you agree to these terms.
      --
      Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/
      To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com

  - Next message: Bill Wohler: "Re: xsane as root"
  - Previous message: Oliver Rauch: "Re: Permissions of /dev/sg* and xsane, xscanimage (was Re: Report on , last CVS snapshot)"
  - Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

  This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Feb 24 2000 - 13:23:18 PST