# Re: Re: Snapscan 310 resolution problem

From: cbagwell@sprynet.com
Date: Wed Nov 29 2000 - 08:08:38 PST

- Next message: Henning Meier-Geinitz: "Re: Feature freeze for 1.0.4"
  - Previous message: Timo Hoderlein: "Re: Snapscan 310 resolution problem"
  - Maybe in reply to: Timo Hoderlein: "Re: Snapscan 310 resolution problem"
  - Reply: Steve Underwood: "Re: Snapscan 310 resolution problem"
  - Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

  sane-devel@mostang.com wrote:
  > Hi Sebastien,
  > you're right. I just donwloaded the manual for my scanner. > Optically, it
  > can scan 300 ppi (horizontal) x 600 ppi (vertical). By interpolation > it
  > scans up to 4800 ppi (horizontal and vertical). Can you tell me how
  > interpolation works?

  This brings up a topic that was discussed a while back. Should we
  have a new classification for scanners that have uneven scan
  resolutions? Those would be allowed to interpolate so that you got
  an even 600 x 600 dpi. I'm assuming the vertical 600 would be a
  better version than pure interpolation alone could produce?

  Chris

      --
      Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/
      To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com

  - Next message: Henning Meier-Geinitz: "Re: Feature freeze for 1.0.4"
  - Previous message: Timo Hoderlein: "Re: Snapscan 310 resolution problem"
  - Maybe in reply to: Timo Hoderlein: "Re: Snapscan 310 resolution problem"
  - Reply: Steve Underwood: "Re: Snapscan 310 resolution problem"
  - Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

  This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Nov 29 2000 - 07:50:35 PST