# Re: Silly noises instead of an Image

aRtsCi - Nikos Diamandis (artsci@freemail.gr)
Tue, 29 Dec 1998 15:46:00 +0200

- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
- Next message: aRtsCi - Nikos Diamandis: "slow , mustek , se , scanexpress, lock"
- Previous message: Hugo van der Kooij: "Re: Sane and xscanimage"
- Maybe in reply to: aRtsCi - Nikos Diamandis: "Silly noises instead of an Image"
- Next in thread: Wolfgang Goeller: "Re: Silly noises instead of an Image"

a.bolsch@ic.ac.uk wrote:
>
> You *have* to specify a valid resolution (i.e. >= 60dpi) explicitly.
> The firmware of the SE scanners is somewhat buggy, so < 60 doesn't work
> at all. And the default in scanimage is just 18 dpi :-)

That's right!!! Thanks man, that's the solution, BUT....
Now the problem is that the scanning is EXTRA VERY SUPER ULTRA slow.
Even as root with ``nice -19'' and option ``--speed Fastest'' and
``--backtrack'' set at both options (yes/no) the scanning is EXTRA VERY SUPER
ULTRA slow (in contrast with the M$ procedure)...
Any experiences?

    --
    Nikolas Diamandis
    mailto:artsci@freemail.gr

    --
    Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/
    To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com

     Next message: aRtsCi - Nikos Diamandis: "slow , mustek , se , scanexpress, lock"
     Previous message: Hugo van der Kooij: "Re: Sane and xscanimage"
     Maybe in reply to: aRtsCi - Nikos Diamandis: "Silly noises instead of an Image"

     Next in thread: Wolfgang Goeller: "Re: Silly noises instead of an Image"