# Re: #include <sane...> instead of "sane..."

From: Jochen Eisinger (jochen.eisinger@gno.de)
Date: Sat Nov 04 2000 - 04:23:21 PST

- Next message: Jochen Eisinger: "Re: #include <sane...> instead of "sane...""
  - Previous message: Karsten Strunk: "Agfa Snapscan-problem"
  - In reply to: Oliver Rauch: "Re: #include <sane...> instead of "sane...""
  - Next in thread: Henning Meier-Geinitz: "Re: #include <sane...> instead of "sane...""
  - Reply: Henning Meier-Geinitz: "Re: #include <sane...> instead of "sane...""
  - Reply: Oliver Rauch: "is lalloca.h installed on any system? [was:#include <sane...> instead of "sane..."]"
  - Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

  Hi!

  [Oliver Rauch]
  > In the manpage of getopt it is described that
  > #include <getopt.h> should be done. So it has
  > to be used or we get problems when getopt is
  > available at the system.
  >
  > With lalloca.h I don`t know but I don`t see
  > a problem here to keep it as it is.

  The problem I saw was that some backends #include "lalloca.h" and some
  use <lalloca.h>

  -- jochen

      --
      Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/
      To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com

  - Next message: Jochen Eisinger: "Re: #include <sane...> instead of "sane...""
  - Previous message: Karsten Strunk: "Agfa Snapscan-problem"
  - In reply to: Oliver Rauch: "Re: #include <sane...> instead of "sane...""
  - Next in thread: Henning Meier-Geinitz: "Re: #include <sane...> instead of "sane...""
  - Reply: Henning Meier-Geinitz: "Re: #include <sane...> instead of "sane...""
  - Reply: Oliver Rauch: "is lalloca.h installed on any system? [was:#include <sane...> instead of "sane..."]"
  - Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

  This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Nov 04 2000 - 04:20:01 PST